Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825
@nickwallen I'm about to open a PR with an updated integration test. We
should be able to close this one, since the changes here aren't relevant
anymore.
---
> (1) [Jon] Make a release in apache/metron-bro-plugin-kafka, then update
Ansible to pin to that release.
The problem with this approach, as I see it, is that it commits us to
having separate releases for the Bro plugin. Which I am not sure if or how
long it will take to come to a consensus on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/842
---
The problem is that we're currently pinning to master and if something in
the plugin breaks backward compatibility, our prior releases will be
perpetually broken, which is why I suggest it blocks the upcoming release.
The alternative would be to update ansible to pin to a specific commit or
to
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/842
METRON-1290: Only first 10 alerts are update when a MetaAlert status is
changed to inactive
## Contributor Comments
This PR supercedes https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825. The fix was
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825
Sounds good. I will take a look at #842.
---
Sorry, missed one. I think this is the one Jon prefers.
(5) The other alternative is just to complete Jon's roadmap BEFORE the next
release.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Nick Allen wrote:
> Just to layout some other alternatives...
>
> (1) [Jon] Make a release in
I expect a few version changes up front to add some new features to the
package (0.1 for the initial release, 0.{2..n} for some new features, 1.0
when we stabilize) but after that it will probably only be updated to
follow kafka/librdkafka updates.
Jon
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:10 AM Otto
Just to layout some other alternatives...
(1) [Jon] Make a release in apache/metron-bro-plugin-kafka, then update
Ansible to pin to that release.
(2) [Jon] Update Ansible to pin to a specific commit.
(3) Wouldn't the submodule approach solve this? I imagine that if we use a
submodule, then all
Github user merrimanr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/826#discussion_r151450858
--- Diff:
metron-interface/metron-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/rest/config/KafkaConfig.java
---
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ public ZkUtils zkUtils() {
How often to we expect to change this? If it is effectively pinned then a
release process is not that bad.
On November 16, 2017 at 10:06:53, Nick Allen (n...@nickallen.org) wrote:
>
> I would suggest that we institute a release procedure for the package
> itself, but I don't think it
While I think that the Bro work is super valuable, Jon, I am not sure that
we need to block the next release for it. In my mind, the "theme" of the
next release is Metaalerts running on ES 2.x. I'd prefer to just stick
with that.
I was hoping we could get the remaining "Metaalerts + ES 2.x" PRs
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825
@nickwallen https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/842
@merrimanr If you're good with that PR, feel free to close this one.
---
Github user merrimanr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825
---
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/841
> During the deployment, I noticed the following message. I was not sure if
this can be ignored or needs to be looked at.
Hi Anand - Thanks for testing! I saw that a few times also.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/839
---
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825
@merrimanr This is already taken care of by the various refactoring in
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/824, right? Can you close this (and the
associated jira) if that's accurate?
---
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/832
I merged with the latest changed from #824
---
My PR is to turn it into a package containing a plugin*
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017, 08:01 zeo...@gmail.com wrote:
> The way master's full-dev is set up right now is non optimal for the bro
> plugin configuration, and I would like to complete the roadmap I outlined
> in my discuss
The way master's full-dev is set up right now is non optimal for the bro
plugin configuration, and I would like to complete the roadmap I outlined
in my discuss thread before a release. I have a PR open against
Apache/metron-bro-plugin-kafka right now to turn it into a plugin, and I
expect it
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/825
Even if the functionality is addressed, are there tests that cover this
condition that we can pull in from this PR? I don't think we ever got a proper
integration test to cover this issue, but
I would suggest that we institute a release procedure for the package
itself, but I don't think it necessarily has to line up with metron
releases (happy to be persuaded otherwise). Then we can just link metron
to metron-bro-plugin-kafka by pointing to specific
metron-bro-plugin-kafka releases
I'd recommend restarting this thread with this subject and including
[MENTORS] in the subject line. At least I don't know the answer to this
and I'd want broader visibility so we get more responses.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Nick Allen wrote:
> The code of the 'Kafka
+ Restarting the thread to include mentors.
The code of the 'Kafka Plugin for Bro' is now maintained in the external
repository that we set up a while back.
- Metron Core: git://git.apache.org/metron.git
- Kafka Plugin for Bro: git://git.apache.org/metron-bro-plugin-kafka.git
(Q) Do we
The code of the 'Kafka Plugin for Bro' is now maintained in the external
repository that we set up a while back. Do we need to change anything in
the release procedure to account for this?
Anybody else having issues spinning up full-dev? I'm consistently failing
on the Metron Alerts UI install. Spun it up fine yesterday for my other
testing.
2017-11-16 17:57:41,772 - Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y
install metron-common' returned 1. Error: Nothing to do
There’s two issues, I think:
(1) We’d like to be able to version and evolve the main body of Metron and the
metron-bro-plugin-kafka separately.
(2) We want to be able to assure that each release of Metron has a
known-working version of metron-bro-plugin-kafka
At a very simple level, we can
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
Even better then. Can we just get rid of it?
---
There’s two issues, I think:
(1) We’d like to be able to version and evolve the main body of Metron and the
metron-bro-plugin-kafka separately.
(2) We want to be able to assure that each release of Metron has a
known-working version of metron-bro-plugin-kafka
At a very simple level, we can
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
Actually the more I think about it, I would not consider a field to be
common between indices when the types mismatch. Hard to say what the right
answer is because there is no real requirement
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
I don't think that method is even used anymore but I will add the mismatch
handling just in case.
---
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
How does `getCommonColumnMetadata` behave when we have a mismatched field
(aka a field named the same in two different indices, but with different
types)? Do we need similar mismatch handling?
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
Was commenting while your comment posted. I think your latest suggestion
is the right answer :)
---
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
The latest commit fixes the bug @justinleet found and adds some test cases
to cover it.
I also removed an "ignoredIndices" variable from the ElasticsearchDao
class. This was being used
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
I tried hitting the `/api/v1/search/column/metadata` endpoint on fulldev
with `["madeupindex"]`; e.g.
curl -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' --header 'Accept:
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
I didn't get myself intimately familiar with this PR, but I wanted to
mention that assuming two fields with the same name but different types between
indexes are not the same may not always hold.
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/827
@JonZeolla I think we should just remove it for now and I've done that in
the latest commit. I'm not entirely clear on what we should expect in this
case and we don't need it right now anyways.
37 matches
Mail list logo