Re: Apache Website Required Links

2018-02-21 Thread Anand Subramanian
Hi All, Any feedback on the new look of the Metron site with the ASF links in the bottom? https://imgur.com/3Y8ZLWL Thanks Anand On 2/16/18, 9:25 PM, "Michael Miklavcic" wrote: That's awesome Anand, thanks for tackling this! On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at

Re: Apache Website Required Links

2018-02-21 Thread Nick Allen
If it meets the requirements, I am happy with it, Anand. Thanks for taking care of this. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Anand Subramanian < asubraman...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Any feedback on the new look of the Metron site with the ASF links in the > bottom? >

[GitHub] metron pull request #895: METRON-1394:Create Rest endpoint to add the ACL fo...

2018-02-21 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/895 ---

[GitHub] metron issue #895: METRON-1394:Create Rest endpoint to add the ACL for curre...

2018-02-21 Thread merrimanr
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/895 +1 by inspection. Thanks @MohanDV! ---

[GitHub] metron issue #933: METRON-1452 Rebase Dev Environment on Latest CentOS 6

2018-02-21 Thread mmiklavc
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/933 Thanks for the info guys. @nickwallen With the reduced swap space, did you notice any issues with performance or services dying? I'm +1 by inspection if you believe we're good. ---

Re: [DISCUSS] community view/roadmap of threat intel

2018-02-21 Thread Ali Nazemian
Hi Simon, Thre are three reasons for why I thought a separate topology may help (However, it was just an example). 1- Threat intel model flexibility: I thought there is no Stellar config available for the threat-intel section, so we will end up using normal Stellar enrichment to address threat

[GitHub] metron issue #933: METRON-1452 Rebase Dev Environment on Latest CentOS 6

2018-02-21 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/933 I did not notice any issues, but I'll spin it up again and compare the difference in swap space just so we know what we're getting into. Thanks for the info @dlyle65535 ! ---

Re: [DISCUSS] Split Elasticsearch and Kibana into separate MPack from Metron

2018-02-21 Thread Michael Miklavcic
Anyone have any opinions on how we should version the ES/Kibana MPack? We currently rev the Metron one based on current Metron version and apply it to both the overall MPack as well as the individual service versions, e.g. metron_mpack-0.4.3.0/common-services/METRON/0.4.3. For ES we have been

Re: [DISCUSS] Split Elasticsearch and Kibana into separate MPack from Metron

2018-02-21 Thread Nick Allen
+1 to the first approach, as you've laid it out. That makes the most sense to me. We need a way to rev the version of the ES Mpack independent of the ES version. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Michael Miklavcic < michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone have any opinions on how we

Re: [DISCUSS] Split Elasticsearch and Kibana into separate MPack from Metron

2018-02-21 Thread zeo...@gmail.com
I agree, the first approach makes the most sense to me. Jon On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM Nick Allen wrote: > +1 to the first approach, as you've laid it out. That makes the most sense > to me. We need a way to rev the version of the ES Mpack independent of the > ES

Re: Vagrant error

2018-02-21 Thread Nick Allen
What are you trying to do? I am not aware of any requirement for a Vagrant plugin called 'vagrant-aws'. The only Vagrant plugin that we require when deploying the development environments is 'vagrant-hostmanager'. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:26 PM, Kevin Waterson

[GitHub] metron issue #933: METRON-1452 Rebase Dev Environment on Latest CentOS 6

2018-02-21 Thread mmiklavc
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/933 This looks good, but before I +1 this, what are we doing in the current special metron cut of centos 6? I'm not familiar enough with why we forked to understand what we're possibly giving up or

Re: [DISCUSS] Split Elasticsearch and Kibana into separate MPack from Metron

2018-02-21 Thread David Lyle
Hi Mike, I agree. Def +1 on the first approach. Keep it with the Metron version. -D... On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Michael Miklavcic < michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone have any opinions on how we should version the ES/Kibana MPack? > > We currently rev the Metron one based

[GitHub] metron issue #933: METRON-1452 Rebase Dev Environment on Latest CentOS 6

2018-02-21 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/933 > what are we doing in the current special metron cut of centos 6? I'm not familiar enough with why we forked to understand what we're possibly giving up or exchanging by switching to the main

[GitHub] metron issue #933: METRON-1452 Rebase Dev Environment on Latest CentOS 6

2018-02-21 Thread dlyle65535
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/933 @mmiklavc - the special cut has a larger swap volume than the standard image. It also is customized to what Metron required at the time to run. That's pretty much it. If that's still desirable,