Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/963
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/962
---
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/914
I love this, sorry I didn't review it sooner @ottobackwards +1 by
inspection. This is great.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/914
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/924
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/959
---
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/959
+1 by inspection, thanks Jon!
---
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/946
@ottobackwards - I have some open changes in a PR against this PR. Just to
confirm, the expected result of this PR should be that users can choose
1. Which client they want to instantiate
2.
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/946
thanks @mmiklavc
---
Github user nickwallen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/961#discussion_r174772238
--- Diff: metron-platform/metron-enrichment/Performance.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,527 @@
+
+
+# Enrichment Performance
+
+This guide defines a
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/958#discussion_r174787158
--- Diff:
metron-contrib/metron-performance/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/performance/load/SendToKafka.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/**
+ *
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/962
+1 looks good. thanks
---
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/963
+1 via inspection
---
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/963
+1 LGTM
---
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/964
Should we think about exposing them as separate things in ambari over all?
Go all the way with this?
---
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/964
Yes, lets get it in there
---
GitHub user cestella opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/964
METRON-1491: The indexing topology restart logic is wrong
## Contributor Comments
If either topology is down, Ambari shows all of Indexing as dead. Clicking
start attempts to start them both
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/964
@ottobackwards yeah, definitely; I think that's ultimately where we want to
go. The first step to that is separating out these functions like I have in
this PR. The next is doing the ambari work
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/964
Ok, created
[METRON-1492](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1492).
---
19 matches
Mail list logo
