Re: [DISCUSS] Metron release 0.5.0

OK, just a point. +1 On May 16, 2018 at 09:31:28, Michael Miklavcic (michael.miklav...@gmail.com) wrote: Agreed Nick - the ES upgrade was pretty extensive on its own. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Nick Allen wrote: > Going to 0.5.0 is well justified without Solr IMO.

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron release 0.5.0

There seemed to be broad support for 0.5.0​ in the previous discuss thread. Reopening that discussion is likely to add another couple days of discussion, which I would prefer to avoid. Just as a reminder, this is a 50,000 foot view of the changes. - Significant performance improvements in

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron release 0.5.0

Agreed Nick - the ES upgrade was pretty extensive on its own. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Nick Allen wrote: > Going to 0.5.0 is well justified without Solr IMO. > > On Wed, May 16, 2018, 7:01 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > > > My question is: Is

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron release 0.5.0

My question is: Is updating the version a .4->.5 worthy change or would adding Solr be that change? Should we do another, last .4.x release and bump to .5 when solr hits? On May 15, 2018 at 17:31:27, Nick Allen (n...@nickallen.org) wrote: +1 That plan works for me. IMHO, I don't think there

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron release 0.5.0

Going to 0.5.0 is well justified without Solr IMO. On Wed, May 16, 2018, 7:01 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > My question is: Is updating the version a .4->.5 worthy change or would > adding Solr be that change? > Should we do another, last .4.x release and bump to .5 when