Re: [VOTE] Retire the MRQL Podling
+1 Sorry about the tardy vote. Regards, Alan > On Aug 7, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Fegaras, Leonidas wrote: > > Dear MRQL community, > According to the "Guide to Retirement" [1] and after the request for > public discussion on the MRQL dev list [2], I would like to call for a > vote to retire MRQL. > MRQL has been dormant during the last four months. MRQL is incubating > for more than four years. We had four releases but very little > community growth (one new PMC member in 2014 and one new committer in > 2016). Due to lack of activity and growth in the podling, I call for > a vote to retire the podling. > The vote will be held open for at least 120 hours (5 days). > If there are no negative binding votes, I will call for a follow-up > vote on the Incubator PMC to confirm the decision to retire MRQL. > Please vote on retiring MRQL: > > [ ] +1 Yes, retire Apache MRQL from the Apache Incubator > [ ] 0 I am undecided > [ ] -1 No, do not retire Apache MRQL because... > > My vote is a sad +1 (binding) > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html > [2] http://markmail.org/message/chpyym5gvsa6sfgd >
Re: [VOTE] Retire the MRQL Podling
Hi Leonidas Thanks for leading this vote. If we get to a point where the community doesn't speak up, we can conclude the vote and move it to the IPMC list. John On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:19 AM Fegaras, Leonidas wrote: > Dear MRQL community, > This is a reminder to vote on retiring the MRQL podling by replying to > this email. > Leonidas Fegaras > > > From: Fegaras, Leonidas > Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:02 AM > To: dev@mrql.incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Retire the MRQL Podling > > Dear MRQL community, > According to the "Guide to Retirement" [1] and after the request for > public discussion on the MRQL dev list [2], I would like to call for a > vote to retire MRQL. > MRQL has been dormant during the last four months. MRQL is incubating > for more than four years. We had four releases but very little > community growth (one new PMC member in 2014 and one new committer in > 2016). Due to lack of activity and growth in the podling, I call for > a vote to retire the podling. > The vote will be held open for at least 120 hours (5 days). > If there are no negative binding votes, I will call for a follow-up > vote on the Incubator PMC to confirm the decision to retire MRQL. > Please vote on retiring MRQL: > > [ ] +1 Yes, retire Apache MRQL from the Apache Incubator > [ ] 0 I am undecided > [ ] -1 No, do not retire Apache MRQL because... > > My vote is a sad +1 (binding) > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html > [2] http://markmail.org/message/chpyym5gvsa6sfgd > >
Re: [VOTE] Retire the MRQL Podling
Dear MRQL community, This is a reminder to vote on retiring the MRQL podling by replying to this email. Leonidas Fegaras From: Fegaras, Leonidas Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:02 AM To: dev@mrql.incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Retire the MRQL Podling Dear MRQL community, According to the "Guide to Retirement" [1] and after the request for public discussion on the MRQL dev list [2], I would like to call for a vote to retire MRQL. MRQL has been dormant during the last four months. MRQL is incubating for more than four years. We had four releases but very little community growth (one new PMC member in 2014 and one new committer in 2016). Due to lack of activity and growth in the podling, I call for a vote to retire the podling. The vote will be held open for at least 120 hours (5 days). If there are no negative binding votes, I will call for a follow-up vote on the Incubator PMC to confirm the decision to retire MRQL. Please vote on retiring MRQL: [ ] +1 Yes, retire Apache MRQL from the Apache Incubator [ ] 0 I am undecided [ ] -1 No, do not retire Apache MRQL because... My vote is a sad +1 (binding) [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html [2] http://markmail.org/message/chpyym5gvsa6sfgd
