+1 for 3.6+
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:54 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> +1 for 3.6+
>
> Yuan Tang schrieb am Do., 22. Aug. 2019, 08:08:
>
> > +1 to target 3.6+
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Leonard Lausen
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable
As Marco has open sourced the bulk of the CI infrastructure donated from
Amazon to the community, I would like to raise the recommendation that the
community takes action to help volunteers working on the CI have a better
experience. In the past, it's my impression that there hasn't been much
Pedro,
I don’t see where Marco says that he “designed and implemented all aspects
of CI by himself”. I do think, however, that it’s fair to say that Marco
was in charge of the design and most likely made the majority of design
decisions as the CI was being built, especially around those tenents
Thanks for your response Marco, I think you have totally missed my original
point which was basically that someone volunteering effort on the CI is as
important as someone contributing a feature. From my perspective this
hasn't been the case, and we had to rely a lot on you and Sheng to submit
I've heard this request multiple times and so far, I'm having issues
understanding the direct correlation between having committer permissions
and being able to manage CI.
When I designed the CI, one of the tenets was maintainability and
accessbility for the community: I wanted to avoid that
Hello dev@,
at the moment, the user experience when submitting a Pull Request has quite
a few issues and discourages people from further contributions. To improve
the situation, I made a design for a Pull Request review bot that will
introduce a process for PRs and also assist maintaining it. I'd
