Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:00 AM Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I think it would be great to have Darcula be one of the standard look and > feels in NetBeans, have contacted the plugin author about this, though also > probably there'll be licensing concerns

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

> El 13 oct 2017, a las 12:41, Martin Dindoffer escribió: > >> What are those small things? Providing a list of those small things, for >> others to implement, is precisely the very significant role that you can >> play in this project. > > Hi there, fellow Java developer

RE: NetBeans 9 release date

I think it would be way more work to copy all valid issues by hand than just import all *open* issues from Bugzilla to JIRA and evaluate them later. Moving manually will probably lose votes, comments, and maybe other valuable information. -- Cezariusz Marek -Original Message- From:

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #141: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review nbjunit

GitHub user geertjanw opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/141 [NETBEANS-54] Module Review nbjunit You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/geertjanw/incubator-netbeans

Re: Linking GitHub account to

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15271 Gj On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > OK, sounds like there are no objects -- and a lot of advantages -- to > using GitBox, so I'll request it (and looking forward to being able to do

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Antonio Vieiro wrote: > > BTW, will all the issues at netbeans.org be migrated to JIRA? > There are various schools of thought on this question. We could move all issues over. Many of the issues are old or out of date or irrelevant, i.e.,

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

> What are those small things? Providing a list of those small things, for > others to implement, is precisely the very significant role that you can > play in this project. Hi there, fellow Java developer here. The thing is, as others have pointed out, Netbeans is quite behind other major IDEs

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Antonio wrote: > > > On 13/10/17 10:49, Peter Steele wrote: > >> The Apache integration should be very prominent on the main page, it >> should >> link to all the relevant Apache pages and should ask for volunteers etc. >> The Apache wiki is

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:35 PM Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > We could move all issues over. > > Many of the issues are old or out of date or irrelevant, i.e., for features > that are no longer there, etc. It would be a massive task for someone to, > once

AW: NetBeans 9 release date

I started to migrate my Bugs to Apache. They are still valid over the years. About 180 or so (more/less). So to migrate others will take users care that NetBeans moves to Apache and they will see it in JIRA or wherever. It will be good, if this could Combine with github issue tracker, because

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

>Have you tried this plugin: >plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/62424/darcula-laf-for-netbeans > >Would be great to have that as part of Apache NetBeans. I use this, it's definitely the best look and feel that you can choose from. But the font used is something that puts me off. On 13 Oct 2017 10:18,

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #126: [NETBEANS-54] Replace Oracle license in form ...

Github user geertjanw commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/126 This would be good to merge, since there are many files we'll be able to exclude from the Rat report in this way. ---

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

> For the specific issue you mention -- would this help: > https://jaxenter.com/netbeans/keep-netbeans-nimble-with- maven-remote-search > I.e., if this were to be integrated into Apache NetBeans, I'm sure Emilian > would be interested in doing that, would that solve the problem? I will try that

Re: Linking GitHub account to

Or maybe we should vote on this as a community before going ahead with it? Gj On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15271 > > Gj > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < >

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #70: WIP custom ant task to produce html report fro...

Github user JaroslavTulach commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70 OK, I try to merge. ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #142: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review spi.debugg...

GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/142 [NETBEANS-54] Module Review spi.debugger.ui - No external binaries. - Removed previous license from many META-INF files. - Two files to be handled centrally (*.sig,

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #135: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review dlight.nativeexec...

Github user vieiro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/135 The assumption is correct: external/exchlp-1.0.zip (generated within the module)[ is indeed covered by the Apache 2.0

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

The netbeans-maven integration is waaa...aay better than what I found in eclipse and intellij. Maven projects are basically native netbeans projects - no extra files necessary. Unless you want to do something in your IDE that you don't want to write in pom.xml, I guess... On Friday, 13 October

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #143: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.w...

GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/143 [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.ws.commons.util - Updated maven coordinates for Apache WS Commons Util (Apache 2.0) - No notice found at

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #70: WIP custom ant task to produce html report fro...

Github user ebarboni commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70 parsing xml with file seems to be dangerous for encoding. #144 use InputSource. Seems to fix the issue on my new non UTF-8 image. ---

Re: [VOTE] Build #19 as HTML/Java API release 1.5

Hello Bertrand and other mentors and PMCs. My key is now listed at https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc Does that mean there is nothing stopping us to approve bits at https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/19/ as release 1.5 of HTML/Java API now? -jt

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Hi Martin, > Also, what if you generate sources with a maven plugin into a folder > different from "/target/generated-sources/" ? Do you use Maven to perform actual builds? If yes, how standard Maven plugins are configured to access those sources? > As always - other IDEs handle it with no

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #144: Use InputSource to parse xml avoid encoding i...

Github user JaroslavTulach commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/144 I used: `curl https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/144.patch | git am` to apply the patch. Let see if it helps. In general XML shall contain its encoding

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

> > For the specific issue you mention -- would this help: > > https://jaxenter.com/netbeans/keep-netbeans-nimble-with-mave n-remote-search > > I.e., if this were to be integrated into Apache NetBeans, I'm sure Emilian > > would be interested in doing that, would that solve the problem? > > I will

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

@Martin Dindoffer: I'm the author of that plugin. My guess is you have been hitting search.maven.org too often and they are rate limiting you. Do you have lots and lots of dependencies or some other reason the plugin could be queries a lot? One thing I'm not doing in the plugin is caching. I

Request for clarification on review process on NetBeans with pngs and other odd files found

I have reviewed my first module (performance), and found some pngs and xml files in a package without headers in src/threaddemo/util/doc-files What is the correct way to handle these? Regards, MArk

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

I'll look into caching and push an update to the plugin, hopefully this month. Should I ping you when I have new binaries? I assume it might not be only about the size, but about the sudden burst of requests during the initial load. --emi On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Martin Dindoffer

Re: Request for clarification on review process on NetBeans with pngs and other odd files found

Hi, - Just ignore image files (png/jpg/gif). - Add a comment to the xml files (you can copy it from nproject/project.xml). Greetings & thanks, Antonio > El 13 oct 2017, a las 16:15, mark stephens > escribió: > > I have reviewed my first module (performance),

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

@Emilian Bold - Well I am working on a quite large multimodule project. So that could be it. The pom file I've been working on during the exceptions was quite small with only a few dependencies. However, it has a few "type:pom,scope:import" dependencies too, so that may inflate the number of

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #70: WIP custom ant task to produce html report fro...

Github user JaroslavTulach commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70 Integrated as 162850d67436764aef5e5dd6016ca636d94921af - builds modified to pick the generated .xml files up. ---

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Yeah a notification would be great. Thanks Emilian Martin 2017-10-13 16:15 GMT+02:00 Emilian Bold : > I'll look into caching and push an update to the plugin, hopefully > this month. Should I ping you when I have new binaries? > > I assume it might not be only about the

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Hi Martin, Thanks for your feedback. Good to know you’re still using NetBeans. By “Eclipse’s dependency tree tool” what do you mean? Something like [1] or like [2]? Should we move these kind of emails to the user list? Thanks, Antonio [1]

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Martin Dindoffer wrote: > Sure, I was just trying to explain myself, and also the opinions of others > around me. Of course Netbeans has many positives, otherwise I wouldn't use > it. But we need to take a sober realistic look at it if we

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #144: Use InputSource to parse xml avoid enc...

GitHub user ebarboni opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/144 Use InputSource to parse xml avoid encoding issue Attempt to fix build due to encoding issue in #70 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: Odd Sun Public License Notice chunk in test generator

https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/140 Hope it helps! Gj On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > OK, no worries at all, will do it. > > Gj > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Emilian Bold > wrote:

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #140: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review java.edito...

GitHub user geertjanw opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/140 [NETBEANS-54] Module Review java.editor create shell script You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Martin Dindoffer wrote: > > * Maven integration is bad. Compared to competition it is slow, the > periodic indexing is painful. The dependency graph generator is unusable on > large projects. > That's an interesting observation because

Re: Linking GitHub account to

OK, sounds like there are no objects -- and a lot of advantages -- to using GitBox, so I'll request it (and looking forward to being able to do merges from GitHub). Gj On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 10/11/2017 02:06 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #70: WIP custom ant task to produce html report fro...

Github user ebarboni commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70 Strange, I wipe and recreate a build base on apache/incubator-netbeans, on a private jenkins (it works). A difference I notice is that encoding on the apache H21,h24 node are iso

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #143: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.w...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/143 ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #143: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review o.apache.ws.commo...

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/143 The binary file is effectively identical. The difference is in the pom.xml files: https://try.diffoscope.org/tsvpkrrvedcy.html ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #142: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review spi.debugg...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/142 ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #142: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review spi.debugger.ui

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/142 Nice! ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #141: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review nbjunit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/141 ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #140: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review java.edito...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/140 ---

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > - netbeans.org is totally void of any Apache information, if you want more > people involved then communication should be updated there. > Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re Apache? I

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Javier Ortiz wrote: > > If NetBeans was unique there would be more help since there were no other > options. But if your time is limited and not available or buggy on NetBeans > you just look around and there are other options. > >

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Antonio Vieiro > wrote: > > ...Should NetBeans support Apache Spark? Tomcat? The Go programming > > language? R? Whatever? Just find a big pool of

AW: NetBeans 9 release date

➢ Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re Apache? ➢ I can see it already myself, it's been there for months -- but where would ➢ you like to see it, where are you looking and not finding the Information ➢ about NetBeans being at Apache? Where are the Information about

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Antonio Vieiro wrote: > ...Should NetBeans support Apache Spark? Tomcat? The Go programming > language? R? Whatever? Just find a big pool of developers and ask them > what to do next, what they need, what they want... Funding such work is

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #139: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review ide.kit

GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/139 [NETBEANS-54] Module Review ide.kit - No external binaries. - Added Apache license to different xml/properties files and release/VERSION.txt. - Added rat exclusion list for

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > ➢ Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re > Apache? > ➢ I can see it already myself, it's been there for months -- but where > would > ➢ you like to see it, where are you looking and not

AW: NetBeans 9 release date

Yeah they started and then they cancled it. The go plugins, are far away of usable. I talked to the devs, because you can see no source Code in the plugin Portal. One Project is at github now, the other one, I’m waiting for the Code. And there are Features missing to implement it as a plugin

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: > Yeah they started and then they cancled it. The go plugins, are far away > of usable. I talked to the devs, because you can see no source Code in the > plugin Portal. One Project is at github now, the other one,

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On 13/10/17 10:19, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: OK, will work on the main page, to add that info more explicitly -- do we have a central page at Apache we should point to from there? E.g., maybe we should point here from various places on the front page of netbeans.org:

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Christian Lenz > wrote: > >> ➢ Where exactly would you like to see information on netbeans.org re >> Apache? >> ➢ I can see it already

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Antonio wrote: > > > On 13/10/17 10:19, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> >> OK, will work on the main page, to add that info more explicitly -- do we >> have a central page at Apache we should point to from there? E.g., maybe >> we >> should

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On 13/10/17 10:49, Peter Steele wrote: The Apache integration should be very prominent on the main page, it should link to all the relevant Apache pages and should ask for volunteers etc. The Apache wiki is ok, but most people know about netbeans.org. Exactly. We should plan the

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > The Apache integration should be very prominent on the main page, it should > link to all the relevant Apache pages and should ask for volunteers etc. > The Apache wiki is ok, but most people know about netbeans.org. >

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

PS: See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/on+top+of+NetBeans for a list, this is the updated version, with more info being added, of https://platform.netbeans.org/screenshots.html. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Antonio wrote: > > > On 13/10/17 09:49,

Re: dlight.nativeexecution license TBD

Hi Antonio, This is correct. Thanks, Vladimir. On 12.10.2017 23:30, Antonio wrote: Hi all, As far as I can tell dlight.nativeexecution/external/ binaries are generated from the scripts and code in the tools directory [1] So I've changed the binaries license from "TBD" to "Apache 2.0" in

Re: AW: NetBeans 9 release date

On 13/10/17 11:24, Christian Lenz wrote: The best IDE for Android is coming from Google and called Android Studio, which is based on Intellij . https://developer.android.com/studio/index.html I think they canceled the Support for the plugin for eclipse, for doing this. Yes, I know, but

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > >Have you tried this plugin: > >plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/62424/darcula-laf-for-netbeans > > > >Would be great to have that as part of Apache NetBeans. > > I use this, it's definitely the best look and feel that you

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

"Apache NetBeans JIRA from scratch" is the most realistic way. It will address issues observed from the latest builds. Adding links Oracle NetBeans Bugzilla is a good compromise as of course there are many which need to be looked at. Some search option on the old bugs which can help. Just my 5

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #70: WIP custom ant task to produce html report fro...

Github user JaroslavTulach commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70 The build is failing: https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/114/console I am not sure why right now. ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #137: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review refactoring.api

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/137 Looks good. ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #134: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review httpserver

Github user vieiro commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/134 Hi, All tests should pass now, but I think the line ext/webserver-3.2.4.jar should look like ext/webserver.jar The "runtime relative path" is the final

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #133: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.cglib

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/133 ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #128: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review javafx2.sa...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/128 ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #128: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review javafx2.sample

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/128 Thank you. ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #126: [NETBEANS-54] Replace Oracle license i...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/126 ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #126: [NETBEANS-54] Replace Oracle license in form ...

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/126 Agreed. I rebased the changes onto head and merged that. Thank you. ---

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

Maven, just like everything else, lacks some of the refinements that can be found in other IDEs. For example, you can't "ctrl+click" through the remote parent references in the poms. And that's a pita in large projects where parents are often only in some remote repos. Also, what if you generate