Re: JDK 10/JDK 18.3 support

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > > Jan, I suggest naming it 18.3 for now. As much as I don't like it, I > don't > > see it becoming 10... :-( > > > > I was mostly trying to avoid dealing with a '.' in the branch name :-). So > jdk18_3, OK? Ah, I lost

Re: Current Status of Apache NetBeans

Geertjan, On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > - The auditing of the 2nd code donation continues, inside Oracle we have > weekly meetings about this, various clusters (i.e., groups of modules) are > ready, others are in progress. >

Re: [VOTE] Build #19 as HTML/Java API release 1.5

+1 Regards, Michael On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Everybody please vote for HTML/Java API version 1.5 - thanks in advance for > confirming the bits work for you. You can find the ZIP, MD5 and SHA1 files > at >

Re: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

; or > somewhat. > > The reason we need to resolve it is to remove ambiguity for downstream > consumers of a future release. > > Regards, > > Craig > > > On Sep 5, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Michael Nascimento <mist...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Regardi

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > For forms, I guess we could (at some point): > -change the form editor to preserve leading comments > -manually add the headers to the form files > -(possibly) change the templates to include the license header when the > form

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Jan, The idea would be to add the license only if it's configured for the project. Regards, Michael On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Michael Nascimento <mist...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed,

Re: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

0 AM, Neil C Smith <neilcsmith@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:10 PM Michael Nascimento <mist...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Two of your options require modifying NetBeans so it generates files > >> differently; that'

Re: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Hi Craig, About form files: they are generated by NetBeans Matisse, so if the license is added, next time they are regenerated, the header will be gone. Are you sure the header must be added then? Regards, Michael On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >

Re: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Craig, On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > [incubator-netbeans-jackpot30.git] / remoting / ide / api / src / org / > > netbeans / modules / jackpot30 / remotingapi / options / > > CustomizeRemoteIndex.form > > xml file with significant data that should have

Re: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

at the moment it's being donated (and I agree having NB to generate license headers could be useful to the general audience). Regards, Michael On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Neil C Smith <neilcsmith@googlemail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:36 PM Michael N

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5

+1 Regards, Michael Virus-free. www.avg.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Sun,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

Geertjan, Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha? Regards, Michael On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this > voting passes, another similar voting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

I guess it won't affect the signature, so +1 (binding). Regards, Michael On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Good point, I don't know, though it can certainly be done. > > Gj > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Mic

Re: HTML/Java checksums was: Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Does this means the platform build only works using binaries > downloaded from search.maven.org, as opposed to binaries built > locally? No, he just had a messed up version deployed in his local Maven repo and

Re: HTML/Java checksums was: Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > That is not the case. I *did* built the correct version locally. Ooops, sorry for jumping to conclusions, Ate. > No, And that is the cause of the issue here. > Every built of a jar will produce a different sha, so you're

Re: Filter mailing list messages

Don't think so. Simply create a rule to delete from:g...@apache.org and you should be good. Regards, Michael On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Charles Bedon wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any way (at mailing list config level) to filter the the type > of messages to be

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Definining Apache NetBeans Days

NetBeans Days are always exciting and it'll be great to call them Apache NetBeans Days now. NetBeans is embracing the Apache way. Congrats to the community! Regards, Michael On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the

Re: [VOTE] PMC chair for Apache NetBeans

+1 Regards, Michael On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:29 AM Glenn Holmer wrote: > This voting thread is to confirm Geertjan Wielenga as the first PMC > chair of NetBeans as we leave incubation and begin our journey as a > top-level Apache project. As an Oracle employee, Geertjan has been in a > unique

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

+1 Regards, Michael On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:48 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > After a discussion amongst the Apache NetBeans community on the dev mailing > list[1], voting on a PMC chair[2], checking the podling status page[3], and > working through the maturity model[4], I would