Re: Apache on Apache was: Build systems [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1]

2018-05-29 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:40:29 -0400 Tim Boudreau wrote: > > Considering William L. Thomson Jr. single-handledly did the Gentoo > > build system for NetBeans using portage it doesn't seem like an > > impossible task. I have been doing Gentoo ebuilds for over a decade. I can crank some stuff

Re: Apache on Apache was: Build systems [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1]

2018-05-28 Thread Tim Boudreau
> Considering William L. Thomson Jr. single-handledly did the Gentoo build > system for NetBeans using portage it doesn't seem like an impossible task. Most modules will be pretty simple - it's those that, say bundle runtimes and things like that whose builds are non-trivial. That may be less of

Re: Apache on Apache was: Build systems [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1]

2018-05-28 Thread Emilian Bold
> When discussing[1] the build systems, have we also considered the Apache > view point - e.g. running Apache on Apache? From this perspective Ant and > Maven are +10... Coding in Apache Groovy using an Apache Subversion repository and an Apache Ant build system :-) > [1] I assume this thread