Hi Team,
Following are the combination of processors that I am using:-
GetFile + SplitText + ExtractText + UpdateAttribute + ExecuteSQL +
ConvertAvroToJson + PutFile
Basically,I have a properties file which contains 5 comma separated values that
are required by the 'DBCPConnectionPool' controlle
Hi Team,
Following are the combination of processors that I am using:-
GetFile + SplitText + ExtractText + UpdateAttribute + ExecuteSQL +
ConvertAvroToJson + PutFile
Basically,I have a properties file which contains 5 comma separated values
that are required by the 'DBCPConnectionPool' controlle
while working with the line count processer it was not performming the task
it is ternsfering the file to the destination can any one help me to do this
--
Sent from: http://apache-nifi-developer-list.39713.n7.nabble.com/
It adds an attribute to the flowfile called text.count.line for line counts.
Thanks,
Mike
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:01 AM, vivek wrote:
> while working with the line count processer it was not performming the
> task
> it is ternsfering the file to the destination can any one help me to do
>
Hello,
We have a use case where we execute processors on all nodes but would like
to use the detect duplicate processor to ensure records are unique. We are
observing that we must run it on one node to truly detect duplicates. Is
there any way to merge flowfiles from all running executors?
-Eric
Hello,
DetectDuplicate uses a DistributedMapCacheClientService which would be
connecting to a DistributedMapCacheServer on one of your nodes.
So all nodes should be connecting to the same cache server which is
where the information about previously seen data is stored.
-Bryan
On Tue, Apr 10, 20
Hi Rishab,
Someone asked a similar question and I answered it on Stack Overflow [1]. The
long and short of it is while the DBCPControllerService properties support
expression language, they do not have access to flowfile attributes, because
the expression language is evaluated on controller ser
+1 to Andy's answer. Note that DBCPConnectionPool isn't a connection
but a connection pool, which keeps some number of connections
available for use by multiple consumers (processors, e.g.). I wouldn't
want to have to keep track of X number of configurations in a single
controller service, which wo
The existing processors will not be refactored to use it. I'm writing new
ones.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Jon Logan wrote:
> Thanks, a few notes -- as far as not using AWS ES, we have been having
> issues with standard-ES, mainly the lack of encryption and authentication
> without the X-
