This doesn't look like a real failure, right?
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-branch-1.4/8/
--
[...truncated 4182 lines...]
deploy:
copy-generated-lib:
test:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13107369#comment-13107369
]
Robert Thomson commented on NUTCH-1074:
---
As far as I can tell, when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13107369#comment-13107369
]
Robert Thomson edited comment on NUTCH-1074 at 9/18/11 7:55 AM:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch 2.0,
I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a
separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. The
arguments for / against can be found in the thread I mentioned.
The
+1
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch
2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to
a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained.
The arguments for / against can be found in the thread I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13107451#comment-13107451
]
Rui Araújo commented on NUTCH-585:
--
Cool! :)
Anyway, as I said before my patch extracts
On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch 2.0,
I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a
separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. The
Hi,
[X ] +1 : Shelve 2.0 and move 1.4 to trunk
[] 0 : No opinion
[] -1 : Bad idea. Please give justification.
Thank you
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-branch-1.4/9/
No worries, Lewis, was just checking. You are doing great!
On Sep 18, 2011, at 12:20 PM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Na it's not Chris, by the looks of it all ant tasks have passed successfully.
I need to do some last configuration to archive artefacts, publish JUnit test
results in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13107518#comment-13107518
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-1109:
-
Although this is good for
-1
I don't want to mark release 2.0 as unmaintained. Cassandra backend
works really well for us and fixed performance problems with hadoop
database. Instead of moving it out trunk, recruit more ppl should come
and fix open problems. don't give up.
Hi Radim,
Thanks for your feedback. Just to dispel the thought that this VOTE will
remove the Nutch-with-Gora version of SVN, it won't remove it (not that it
could
ever fully remove it anyways since SVN is a version control system it
Nutch-with-Gora
will always be around in some form or
+1
On 09/18/2011 04:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of
Nutch 2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from
the trunk to a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0
as unmaintained. The arguments for
14 matches
Mail list logo
