[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (NUTCH-1074) topN is ignored with maxNumSegments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107369#comment-13107369 ] Robert Thomson edited comment on NUTCH-1074 at 9/18/11 7:55 AM:

[VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

Hi, Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch 2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. The arguments for / against can be found in the thread I mentioned. The

Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

+1 > Hi, > > Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch > 2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to > a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. > The arguments for / against can be found in the thread I

Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

+1 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Julien Nioche < lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch > 2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a > separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and c

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-585) [PARSE-HTML plugin] Block certain parts of HTML code from being indexed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107451#comment-13107451 ] Rui Araújo commented on NUTCH-585: -- Cool! :) Anyway, as I said before my patch extracts t

Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote: > Hi, > > Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch 2.0, > I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a > separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. The > ar

Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

Hi, [X ] +1 : Shelve 2.0 and move 1.4 to trunk [] 0 : No opinion [] -1 : Bad idea. Please give justification. Thank you On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Follow

Jenkins build is back to normal : Nutch-branch-1.4 #9

See

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Nutch-branch-1.4 #8

No worries, Lewis, was just checking. You are doing great! On Sep 18, 2011, at 12:20 PM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > Na it's not Chris, by the looks of it all ant tasks have passed successfully. > > I need to do some last configuration to archive artefacts, publish JUnit test > results in a re

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1109) Add Sonar targets to Ant build.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107518#comment-13107518 ] Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-1109: - Although this is good for indep

Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

-1 I don't want to mark release 2.0 as unmaintained. Cassandra backend works really well for us and fixed performance problems with hadoop database. Instead of moving it out trunk, recruit more ppl should come and fix open problems. don't give up.

[DISCUSS] What will happen to Nutch Gora aka Nutchbase (was Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk)

Hi Radim, Thanks for your feedback. Just to dispel the thought that this VOTE will remove the Nutch-with-Gora version of SVN, it won't remove it (not that it could ever fully remove it anyways since SVN is a version control system it Nutch-with-Gora will always be around in some form or fashi

Re: [VOTE] Move 2.0 out of trunk

+1 On 09/18/2011 04:21 AM, Julien Nioche wrote: Hi, Following the discussions [1] on the dev-list about the future of Nutch 2.0, I would like to call for a vote on moving Nutch 2.0 from the trunk to a separate branch, promote 1.4 to trunk and consider 2.0 as unmaintained. The arguments for /