Glad to see were making progress here.
Same with me, I am ready to move on with the project and move out of this
'rut' we have been in with trunk.
Thanks
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Markus,
>
> No worries. I actually ha
Hey Markus,
No worries. I actually have no dog in this fight to be honest.
I want Gora to be successful, and I want Nutch to be successful.
I haven't contributed much to Nutch 2.0 trunk but I have been
to the 1.x series branch. I wish I knew more about Gora's internals (and
am trying to learn
Hi Chris,
I initially respawned this thread with the suggestion to not to wait until
january orso before the vote. Hence my apologies for being impatient and
pessimistic about trunk :)
Cheers,
> Hey Julien,
>
> My option E was pretty much equivalent to B except I specified a time frame
> (nex
Hey Julien,
My option E was pretty much equivalent to B except I specified a time frame
(next 6 months). Are we just
saying that we'll accelerate the time frame to say, umm, next week or the week
after? :)
If so, fine by me. Since I moved nutchbase into the trunk at one point, I'd be
happy on
Let's keep it simple. Let's vote for option B (i.e. shelve 2.0), if most
people are in favour then we don't need to look into other options at all.
If not, we'll see what alternatives or arguments come up and vote on these
later.
I assume that only PMC votes will be binding and the majority takes
Why don't we just collect VOTEs for each of the options a-e, and then
figure out based on that if there is a majority. If there's no majority, we
can widdle it down to say the top 2-3, and then VOTE on those, looking
for majority again.
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Markus Jelsma
Option B) Shelve trunk in a branch and promote 1.4 to trunk. We can always
choose to hardwire HBASE (option D) later.
Markus
> Am happy to call for a vote on the future of Nutch 2.0 if you want. Shall
> we reduce the various options described before to a single one?
>
> Julien
>
> On 15 Septem
Hi Julien,
I didn't want to skip ship with this one, but it seems that the binding
community has already spoken their mind, and I for one shadow your
suggestion.
It's clear that trunk as it currently exists is not bleeding edge, there
have been too many broken fronts to launch a concentrated code
Am happy to call for a vote on the future of Nutch 2.0 if you want. Shall we
reduce the various options described before to a single one?
Julien
On 15 September 2011 19:55, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I thought I'd chime in on this thread. My comments below:
> > > I understand an
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> There are many things i can write about this topic right now but don't feel
> it's neccessary. The choice is difficult and perhaps painful but when the
> voting round is opened by our project lead, i will vote for promoting 1.x back
> to trun
> Hi Guys,
>
> I thought I'd chime in on this thread. My comments below:
> > I understand and share your frustration, however you need to bear in mind
> > that things are done only if people volunteer and have time - usually
> > taken from their holiday, weekends, evenings. Chris (who is the de f
Hi Guys,
I thought I'd chime in on this thread. My comments below:
> I understand and share your frustration, however you need to bear in mind
> that things are done only if people volunteer and have time - usually taken
> from their holiday, weekends, evenings. Chris (who is the de facto release
Hi,
Without changing the flow of conversation and the points which have already
been touched upon, I would like to add:
I am really split here between a couple of decisions. I like the abstraction
that Gora provides, even though it is somewhat of a pain to configure, this
also presents a barrier
Julien, devs, users,
I'd like to see bugs fixed in 2.0 but some of them are way out of my league or
would cost me an absurd amount of time. I'd also really like to use Gora but
Gora must be maintained. Gora will play a fundamental role in 2.0 and if
something is broken there it is not trivial t
Hi Tom,
> I have been using Nutch 1.x for the last 9 months or so and it works well
> for large scale crawls up to around a billion pages. However, the inherent
> lack of random access in HDFS really starts to become a burden on our hadoop
> cluster when going through the whole generate/update/f
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 8:31 AM
To: dev@nutch.apache.org
Cc: gora-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies
org.apache.gora#gora-hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk]
Julien,
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Julien Nioche
Julien,
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kirby,
>
> Grumble, Grumble. (adding dev@nutch, as that is more than likely
>> where this discussion really belongs)...
>>
>
> am adding gora-...@incubator.apache.org as well
>
>
>> It'd be reall
17 matches
Mail list logo
