> If i look at the statistics, it says I have 19 thousand commits. That should
> be 36 thousand
Probably Github is not assigning older commits to you.
For instance the first one:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/commit/b08a86171f237f948fad94fa4906374ad3f413bc
It's your username, but it
The GitHub mirror repo shows 36,000 commits. A "git log —reverse" shows the first
commit as "Sat Feb 17 23:21:28 2007”. AFACS no history has been lost.
Yes, now I see the same thing with "git log --reverse", but I was not
seeing a few days ago. I was seeing a date in 2013.
If i look at the statistics, it says I have 19 thousand commits. That should
be 36 thousand
Probably Github is not assigning older commits to you.
For instance the first one:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/commit/b08a86171f237f948fad94fa4906374ad3f413bc
It's your username, but it
It appears we have lost the first 6 year of history in the NuttX repository.
The oldest commit looks like it is from 2013. The oldest should be from
february 2007.If i look at the statistics, it says I have 19 thousand commits.
That should be 36 thousand,Is the repository permanently broken?
Hi,
> That should be 36 thousand,Is the repository permanently broken?
The GitHub mirror repo shows 36,000 commits. A "git log —reverse" shows the
first commit as "Sat Feb 17 23:21:28 2007”. AFACS no history has been lost.
Thanks,
Justin
In Bitbucket we can see that we have all the history:
https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/nuttx-old/commits/?page=1436
Locally (from a github clone) I can do git log --oneline | tail and I
see the same last 10 commits as in bitbucket.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:51 AM spudaneco wrote:
>
> It appears we
>
> 2013 must be the year that I switched from SVN to GIT?
>
Apparently, yes:
https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/nuttx-old/commits/ca08f96482926d35b52101a863c4b6cfebdfca35
We can see here https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/nuttx-old/commits/?page=989
that every commit before ca08f96
So assuming all the code is dual licensed GPL/BSD and not a mixture of licenses
then we’re fine to use it. We would need to note its license in our LICENSE
file.
Great! So I am proposing to assist the parties that are interested in
the development by creating a SocketCAN branch and
Justin,
Is there some docs to guide us in making this licencing transition? I would
be happy to start the processing of adding spdx headers based on what is in
the code if that would help, but I don't know how to transition files to
Apache 2 under this project.
I also know that while most of the
> On Jan 18, 2020, at 3:48 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
>
>> This is not to say that this is a 100% stable development platform. There
>> are still a few dangling, loose ends that I am aware and most likely more
>> that I am not aware of. ... So basic functionality is there, but any real
Hi,
It would be great if some people start working on these issues otherwise it
will hold up making a release. I raised a couple of Github issues for the most
urgent ones e.g having a LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER and putting ASF headers
on files.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Is there some docs to guide us in making this licencing transition? I would
> be happy to start the processing of adding spdx headers based on what is in
> the code if that would help, but I don't know how to transition files to
> Apache 2 under this project.
It’s easy enough:
- Add ASF
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 7:11 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Is there some docs to guide us in making this licencing transition? I
> would
> > be happy to start the processing of adding spdx headers based on what is
> in
> > the code if that would help, but I don't know how to transition files
In general, BSD licensed files with "Copyright (C) 20XX Gregory Nutt” would
have the ASF header on them, but we may need to double check that they are not a 3rd
party file that’s just had some changes to it or been reformatted.
That is kind of offensive. I would never do something like
To let us get started digging into properly analyzing the code in both the
incubator-nuttx and incubator-nuttx-apps repos I spun up a Fossology server
and uploaded both git repositories and used the automated monk scanner.
You are welcome to see it for yourself at:
Hi,
> That is kind of offensive. I would never do something like that. I have
> never intentionally violated a license. I always give credit when credit is
> due.
You're misunderstanding me, I’m describing the conditions under which we can
change the headers to ALv2. In some cases you have
Hi,
Thanks for that. One minor issue exist with the HPND license. I’ve raised a
legal JIRA for that. [1] this would not hold up a release.
Justin
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-506
Hi,
For the four clause BSD file, there files are OK, because of [1]
incubator-nuttx/libs/libc/stdlib/lib_bsearch.c
incubator-nuttx/libs/libc/stdlib/lib_qsort.c
incubator-nuttx/libs/libc/stdio/lib_libdtoa.c
incubator-nuttx/libs/libc/stdio/legacy_dtoa.c
Basically that clause can be removed.
Wee
Hi,
> So for the OS BSD headers we would need to keep them on the file as well as
> include it in the NOTICE file?
No you would generally not add to NOTICE, only some things are added to NOTICE.
See [1]
> What happens when someone modifies one of these old files once the project
> makes the
Hi,
In general, BSD licensed files with "Copyright (C) 20XX Gregory Nutt” would
have the ASF header on them, but we may need to double check that they are not
a 3rd party file that’s just had some changes to it or been reformatted.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
From memory when I took a quick look at this I think I found about 160
different pieces of 3rd parties codes. A little car may need to be taken as
some files have double license headers.
Thanks,
Justin
21 matches
Mail list logo
