buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins/builds/326 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build

Re: Integration Issues(REST/SOAP) for the latest version 16.11 release in SVN

Hi Allan, I look your issue on Stackoverflow and I not understand what you tried to do with the legacy-db. How you connect on this db, where is define the data model relative to this db. Do you define some crud service relative to entities that you want to expose ? Nicolas Le 10/08/2017

buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk-framework

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/356 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The

Re: Rule to deprecated a service

Imagine we are the 30 december 2019 and we decide to create a new release. We have on trunk : * addCatalogMember deprecated since="next release" * deleteRateAmount deprecated since="17.11" * deleteWorkEffortAssignment depraceted since="18.12" We prepare the release, we have on trunk : *

Re: [Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email

Hi Swapnil, Great idea! Best regards, Pierre On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 at 08:01 Swapnil Mane wrote: > Hello Devs, > > While looking into the support of email templates for Product Store, we > found it is managed by screens. > > Like for Order Completion > > >

Re: Welcome Rishi Solanki as a New Committer!

Welcome to the team, Rishi! Regards, Michael Am 09.08.17 um 10:56 schrieb Sharan Foga: The OFBiz PMC has invited Rishi Solanki to become a new committer and are happy to announce that he has accepted. Some of the key factors considered for inviting him were as follows: - He has been

Re: [Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email

Hi Swapnil, you can achieve this by just putting something like: <@renderSubContentCache subContentId="${yourContentId!}"/> in your template file for the corresponding screen and edit the content like you proposed. This solution does not support the fallback mechanism you proposed but does

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hello Jacques, It's a good example why I explained that delete is interesting in some cases. We implemented a process with template workeffort where an operator create a production run from the templating and delete some task that is not needed before start. In this context, I have no

[Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email

Hello Devs, While looking into the support of email templates for Product Store, we found it is managed by screens. Like for Order Completion Here you can see, we are having dependency on screens (i.e. templates defined in file system) Due to this, the user is unable to edit the email

Re: Welcome Akash Jain as a New Committer!

Welcome to the team, Akash! Regards, Michael Am 09.08.17 um 10:58 schrieb Sharan Foga: The OFBiz PMC has invited Akash Jain to become a new committer and are happy to announce that he has accepted. Some of the key factors considered for inviting him were as follows: - He has been involved

Re: Welcome Akash Jain as a New Committer!

Thanks to all for the wonderful wishes! Thanks and Regards -- Akash Jain On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Sharan Foga wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Akash Jain to become a new committer and are > happy to announce that he has accepted. > > Some of the key factors

Re: [Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email

+1 Jacques Le 11/08/2017 à 08:29, Pierre Smits a écrit : Hi Swapnil, Great idea! Best regards, Pierre On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 at 08:01 Swapnil Mane wrote: Hello Devs, While looking into the support of email templates for Product Store, we found it is

Re: Welcome Rishi Solanki as a New Committer!

Many Congratulations Rishi! Thanks and Regards -- Akash Jain On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Sharan Foga wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Rishi Solanki to become a new committer and are > happy to announce that he has accepted. > > Some of the key factors considered for

Re: [Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email

+1 Swapnil Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Swapnil Mane < swapnil.m...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello Devs, > > While looking into the support of email templates for Product Store, we > found it is managed by

Re: [Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email

Hello Swapnil, In past I tried to refactoring email interface with the idea to : * deprecate current ProductStoreEmailSetting to link it to TemplateEmailSetting. The purpose is to centralize all email configuration in this entity * link TemplateEmailSetting with Content through

Re: Rule to deprecated a service

Hello, I imagine the following process : * deprecated on trunk an element and indicate since="$NextReleaseBranch" (or somethink like that) * When before create the new release branch like 17.11 : ** run a replaceAll $NextReleaseBranch by 17.11 ** update the trunk * Create the new stable branch

buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins/builds/329 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build

buildbot exception in on ofbiz-trunk-framework

The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/357 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The

buildbot exception in on ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins

The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins/builds/327 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build

buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk-framework

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework/builds/359 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: orcus_ubuntu Build Reason: The

Re: Rule to deprecated a service

This is interesting too https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6273 (thanks Deepak at OFBIZ-9569) Jacques Le 11/08/2017 à 17:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Nicolas, I'm unsure about your point "remove all element contains with a since not on the last stable branch on trunk" I

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Also for beginners we have this advice in FAQ... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo#FAQ-Tips-Tricks-Cookbook-HowTo-obsolete Jacques Le 11/08/2017 à 17:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Nicolas, All, Nicolas: are you speaking about

Re: Missing Method Implementations in OrderChangeHelper

Hello Jacques, thank you for your reply. I have created a new JIRA-ticket dedicated to removing deprecated code since the one you referred me to seemed to be specifically for code that is commented out. The ticket can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9569

Re: Rule to deprecated a service

Hi Nicolas, I'm unsure about your point "remove all element contains with a since not on the last stable branch on trunk" I guess you mean "to remove on trunk all elements which contains a 'since=releaseBranchNumber' with releaseBranchNumber being different from the last stable branch just

Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?

Hi Nicolas, All, Nicolas: are you speaking about deleteProductionRunRoutingTask (OFBIZ-9568), deleteWorkEffort (OFBIZ-9185) or both ? I think you answered only about deleteWorkEffort and then I agree. I was also reluctant to remove it. But then we need to define what would be it's minimal