Re: OM 3.1.4 #467 double arrow button light

2016-12-07 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
OK, no objection So last step is enabled: Committed revision 1773171. On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello PMCs, > > Any other opinions? > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > >> This is

Re: OM 3.1.4 #467 double arrow button light

2016-12-01 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
This is actually not easy question :( We do have lots of emails from users like: file upload broken, please help! recordings broken, please help! This additional required step can help to know about issues like this _before_ OM will be started On the other hand, too complicated wizard is not

Re: OM 3.1.4 #467 double arrow button light

2016-12-01 Thread Alvaro
...i think that any installation of servers or of any other software, should be as simple as possible, and once installed, the user already has more self-confidence regarding software, then use the corresponding tools for lots of testing. In my opinion, put that tool during the installation

Re: OM 3.1.4 #467 double arrow button light

2016-12-01 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello Alvaro, I'm afraid these new checks will be useless if it will be possible to skip them WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Dec 1, 2016 17:09, "Alvaro" wrote: > > ...i send to you the screenshot by private way. > > The installation changes you made are

Re: OM 3.1.4 #467 double arrow button light

2016-12-01 Thread Alvaro
...i send to you the screenshot by private way. The installation changes you made are rights, but also can be the option to skip these new steps. It i say, is to stay the button double arrow enabled as it was till now. Do you know what i mean? ... On jue,

Re: OM 3.1.4 #467 double arrow button light

2016-12-01 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello Alvaro, I see no attachment :( Installer was recently changed so new users can check if all 3rd party tools are correctly installed I believe this change is important to get consistent OM installation On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro wrote: > Hello Maxim, > >