Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want download links for Dev Builds on a usual webpage?

2012-11-15 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 11/11/2012 Kay Schenk wrote: On 11/11/2012 04:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds (they are also called with/without system integration

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want download links for Dev Builds on a usual webpage?

2012-11-14 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 11/11/2012 Kay Schenk wrote: On 11/11/2012 04:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds (they are also called with/without system integration respectively). OK, I see this note and I confess I don't pay much attention to

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want download links for Dev Builds on a usual webpage?

2012-11-11 Thread Kay Schenk
[top posting] I think the setup we ahve right now -- linking to the wiki that then links to developer areas (possibly) is fine. We might think about moving the developer editions to SourceForge but maybe an additional step we don't need. ok for this, see below... On 11/11/2012 04:22 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want download links for Dev Builds on a usual webpage?

2012-11-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Hi all, a quick question as I don't know the status of this request: Do we (still) want to have download links for Dev Builds that refer to the respective people's dir? IMHO we don't want pages in

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want download links for Dev Builds on a usual webpage?

2012-11-09 Thread jan iversen
Hi. In order to make life easier (more stable) for translators, I think it would be a good idea to isolate developer builds on dev. When we have langauge packs integrated, then we could point to them from l10n, with a thick note, stating they are only there for testing the language. In order to