On 07/26/2015 03:28 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 24/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
On 06/23/2015 11:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Before we do anything with it, can we decide on the name?
oooextras.mirror is clearly confusing since it is not a mirror ...
I thought the SF mirror was just that --
On 24/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
On 06/23/2015 11:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Before we do anything with it, can we decide on the name?
oooextras.mirror is clearly confusing since it is not a mirror ...
I thought the SF mirror was just that -- a mirror of
/trunk/external_sources ... the
On 23/06/2015 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
oooextras is back from few hours now.
Thank you for this. I believe nothing was lost, since this was supposed
to be a proof of concept for Apache Extras and I don't think we had
uploaded new libraries there.
Before we do anything with it, can we
On 06/23/2015 11:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/06/2015 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
oooextras is back from few hours now.
Thank you for this. I believe nothing was lost, since this was supposed
to be a proof of concept for Apache Extras and I don't think we had
uploaded new libraries
2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the SF
mirror must have been deactivated just a day or so ago.
Could it be that
On 06/23/2015 08:00 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the SF
mirror must have been
2015-06-23 22:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 06/23/2015 08:00 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
yes, they would be...based on the
On 06/23/2015 01:48 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2015-06-23 22:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 06/23/2015 08:00 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 21/06/2015 Kay
On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the SF
mirror must have been deactivated just a day or so ago.
Could it be that this is an unintended consequence of SourceForge's new
policy
On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the SF
mirror must have been deactivated just a day or so ago.
Could it be that this is an unintended consequence of SourceForge's new
policy when they decided, for transparency towards the
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hi all,
I want to make a new build from current trunk. I have got a lot of
download failures in ./bootstrap.
I have attached a log file and in addition I copy the relevant parts of
the file below (for the case
Hello Kay,
for my personal need, I can copy the files from older local directories.
I'm looking for a general solution, because the build bots seem to be
affected too.
Do you know someone to provide a longtime host of those files? Do you
know the download volume per week for OpenOffice for
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hello Kay,
for my personal need, I can copy the files from older local directories.
OK, we have been keeping copies up to date here though we don't use them
directly for the actual builds. I have foudn if you
13 matches
Mail list logo
