Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Marcus
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski: After a night's sleep I decided that we should release the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? I decided that,

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Peter kovacs
Jim, you are the Boss! :) It is good you stay Release Manager! I appreciate that a lot! Am 11. Oktober 2017 18:27:55 MESZ schrieb Kay Schenk : > >On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: >> >>> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski >wrote: >>>

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Kay Schenk
On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: After a night's sleep I decided that we should release the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. +1

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414 URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414 Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414 Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 Revision:

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Jim, can you give a short hint when you start building RC5 and the revision#? Matthias Am 11.10.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review > and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;) > > Thx! >> On Oct 11, 2017, at

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
I am starting on macOS and Linux-64 builds for 4.1.4-RC5 as we speak. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:20:53 -0400 Jim Jagielski wrote: > After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. > > So the remaining question was/is: What do

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Pedro Lino
> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. +1 > So the plan is to "re-open"

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;) Thx! > On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are these requested as 4.1.4

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, >> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. >> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply >> to it the 2 patches that have

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz? No. >> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> If time permits, could you have a look at: >> >>

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz? > On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > If time permits, could you have a look at: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Jim Jagielski wrote: I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415 (after adjusting the version

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

2017-10-11 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, If time permits, could you have a look at: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538 Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4. Regards, Matthias P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5 Am