Re: [dev] Quickstarter on Linux

2006-10-24 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Bjoern, since when do we have a quick-starter for Linux? I thought this was not Since michael and kendy deemed one necessary and CWS gtkquickstart got integrated in m187. Aha. Was there an announcement? http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=allfeaturesmsgNo=3145 You should

Re: [dev] Hunspell UNO Component Build Help

2006-10-24 Thread Németh László
Hi, Wiki pages about building OOo: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_OpenOffice.org If you build OpenOffice.org, you will be able to build Hunspell UNO component with a simple build command, see Hunspell UNO README. There is also a faster method to check the improved libraries:

Re: [dev] Calc cell justification

2006-10-24 Thread Niklas Nebel
Alan Yaniger wrote: If I have a given ScBaseCell object, I want to set the justification based on its text. I know that I can get the text through GetStringData(). But how can I change the justification setting of that cell? The alignment attribute is part of the cell attributes that are

Re: [dev] Quickstarter on Linux

2006-10-24 Thread Bjoern Milcke
Hi Frank et al, since when do we have a quick-starter for Linux? I thought this was not Since michael and kendy deemed one necessary and CWS gtkquickstart got integrated in m187. Aha. Was there an announcement? http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=allfeaturesmsgNo=3145 Oops,

Re: [dev] Quickstarter on Linux

2006-10-24 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Bjoern, In my m189, the checkbox is named Enable systray quickstarter. No mention of a system start - as you said, this would not be possible. So, enable means start the quickstarter next time I start OOo (if it is not already running)? Don't know. It doesn't work in my installation -

[dev] New refresh of windows for Ooo2.0.4 under WinXP

2006-10-24 Thread Michele Zarri
Dear Dev, I have installed version 2.0.4 on WinXP and I noticed already a strange flickering in the buttons which I created with a macro. It is very easy to reproduce this behaviour: just create a dialog, add a couple of oversized buttons with some light background colour, then execute the

[dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-24 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Frank, On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 13:12 +0200, Frank Schönheit - wrote: To me, this whole discussions seems to be about the bring it in quick (and sometimes dirty) vs. bring it in slow, but matured (though sometimes still dirty) Well - it looks like that on the face of it.

Re: [dev] Quickstarter on Linux

2006-10-24 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Bjoern, On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 13:00 +0200, Frank Schönheit - wrote: But, coming back to a more technical stand-point, how does this work? Don't know. Michael said he simply ported the existing Windows code Basically yes, there is an empty OO.o window running in the background all

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-24 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Michael, (separating out the following from the more general discussion) [1] Did I mention your port doesn't work as expected for me? After the first start, I have a quickstarter. After closing it, I never get it back, again, not even with checking the respective option in the

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-24 Thread Uwe Fischer
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote: gtkquickstart2 also has the benefit of disabling the quickstarter in Sun builds (i#70644#), which (I hope) will solve the problems for ~everyone (except your customers) [ it is now necessary to turn that off, in the CWS since it changes a string too

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-24 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Frank Schönheit - wrote: (separating out the following from the more general discussion) :-) I meant what I said: never. Not even restarting OOo gives me back the quickstarter. Well, not really never: When I erase my OOo user data directory I get

Re: [dev] Warning: operator += enforces hidden conversion

2006-10-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Bjoern Milcke wrote: Hi Stephan, I came across the following piece of code: String a; xub_StrLen n = 0; n += a.Len(); This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning: warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss of data (in the last

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-24 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Uwe, On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 16:51 +0200, Uwe Fischer wrote: so you introduced a cool new feature (by surprise to me), and then some people told you that it's not up to the normal procedures to do so, and now you disabled that feature for Sun builds? :-) basically yes, although of

Re: [dev] UNO STL

2006-10-24 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi CLAIRE,, On Monday, 2006-10-23 16:16:09 +0100, CLAIRE, Narinder, Group Risk Mgmt wrote: When Building an uno component in C++ with a Makefile taken from one of the examples in SDK, which STL is visible, the native STL or STLport ? STLport. If STLport , then if the uno component links to

Re: [dev] New refresh of windows for Ooo2.0.4 under WinXP

2006-10-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Michele, Michele Zarri wrote: Dear Dev, I'm not a dev, however have a few questions. I have installed version 2.0.4 on WinXP and I noticed already a strange flickering in the buttons which I created with a macro. It is very easy to reproduce this behaviour: just create a dialog, add a

Re: [dev] New refresh of windows for Ooo2.0.4 under WinXP

2006-10-24 Thread Michele Zarri
Hello Cor, Thanks for the reply, my answers inline :) Cheers, Michele On 10/24/06, Cor Nouws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michele, I have installed version 2.0.4 on WinXP and I noticed already a strange flickering in the buttons which I created with a macro. It is very easy to reproduce