Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Hi Frank, On Wednesday, 2009-08-26 20:59:40 +0200, Frank Schönheit wrote: I'll leave the task of building boost and linking against it for you, for a follow-up CWS :) /me hoped for it magically appearing, ready to use ;-) Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the e...@sun.com account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use er...@sun.com Thanks. pgplyjrZoZomT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Hi, overlooked this ... On Wednesday, 2009-08-19 10:20:18 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35. The accuracy of those functions is ongoing work in Calc and doing it ourself has been a lot of work. Please talk with Eike about the need for that libraries. Though that also would result in linkage against the actual lib while we so far only used boost headers. Nothing bad per se, but it should be kept in mind (and the boost module needs to be changed to actually build boost :-)) This indeed might be an obstacle.. hopefully things changed since I last tried years ago, getting that Jam build stuff to run on all major platforms was horrible back then, and didn't ... However, having the boost math lib would be of great benefit for Calc, so I strongly vote for possibly the latest version of boost that's available, but at least 1.35 Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the e...@sun.com account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use er...@sun.com Thanks. pgpkxynoxZ78C.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Hi Eike, However, having the boost math lib would be of great benefit for Calc, so I strongly vote for possibly the latest version of boost that's available, but at least 1.35 I didn't hear any strong objections against using 1.39 (or 1.38 at least for system-boost), so I think I'll go for that. I'll leave the task of building boost and linking against it for you, for a follow-up CWS :) Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer frank.schoenh...@sun.com - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Hi Frank, Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg schrieb: Hi Rene, [..] [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime checks with this version. The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35. The accuracy of those functions is ongoing work in Calc and doing it ourself has been a lot of work. Please talk with Eike about the need for that libraries. kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35. The accuracy of those functions is ongoing work in Calc and doing it ourself has been a lot of work. Please talk with Eike about the need for that libraries. Though that also would result in linkage against the actual lib while we so far only used boost headers. Nothing bad per se, but it should be kept in mind (and the boost module needs to be changed to actually build boost :-)) Grüße/Regards, Rene - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:56 +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: If boost 1.39 proves to be too problematic, We've been building with 1.39 for some time without any noticeable problems except for one little buglet in the function_template header where a #if !defined(BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS) is in the wrong place. Patch to fix that is available from http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/boost/boost-function_template.patch?view=markup C. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Hi Caolán, We've been building with 1.39 for some time without any noticeable problems good to know, thanks. except for one little buglet in the function_template header where a #if !defined(BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS) is in the wrong place. Yeah, stumbled upon this, too. Thanks Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer frank.schoenh...@sun.com - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
