Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.18

+1 Em ter., 8 de set. de 2020 às 02:40, Daniel Dias Dos Santos < daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi, > > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020, 11:22 Mark Struberg > wrote: > > > hi! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.17 > > > > The following tickets have bee

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebbeans 2.0.20

+1 Em qui., 12 de nov. de 2020 às 11:22, Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu: > +1 > > Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > : > > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 12.11.2020 um 11:04 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.10

+1 Em qui., 12 de nov. de 2020 às 11:23, Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu: > +1 > > Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > : > > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 12.11.2020 um 13:39 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre : > > > > > > +1 (non bin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebbeans 2.0.21

+1 Em dom., 3 de jan. de 2021 às 16:57, Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi all, > > Here is the vote for our OWB 2.0.21. > > Overall we have two main changes: > > 1. fix OwbRequestContextController web integration > 2. add some startup improvements and enable to use graalv

Added initial .gitignore file.

Hey folks, I sent a PR to added a initial gitignore file. :) PR: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/1 -- Att; Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: Added initial .gitignore file.

Thanks Jean, I hope contribute more. On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Doing that now > > > > 2014-06-04 12:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > > > Hey folks, > > > > I sent a PR to added a initial gitignore file. :) > > >

Examples

Hi Struberg, I saw your IRC msg , but I was going to work. (I got up later today) I remember that I had problem with tomcat7 example and it seems problem with dependency as you spoke in last IRC conversation -- Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.

OWB-983 Patch

Hi guys, I worked in a simple patch to sample. Can someone review it? OWB-983 Thanks. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) Sent from my cell phone.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Reinhard Sandtner as new Apache OpenWebBeans committer

Congrats Reinhard. :D -- Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha Sent from my cell phone Em 30/09/2014 07:59, "Ma

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans-trunk #1128

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See <https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/1128/changes> > > Changes: > > [struberg] OWB-654 fix manual lookup of beans with generic types > > Txs to Daniel Cun

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans-trunk #1128

wrote: > Hi Daniel, probably I missed that in the commit. Will check > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 31.05.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Daniel Cunha : > > > > It's weird! > > You are missing these files: > > > > > webbeans-impl/src/test/java/

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans-trunk #1128

Ops I think that we don't want to see this build. But, I saw the changes. Thank you Mark! :) On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Cunha wrote: > Hi Mark, > > works fine now: > > build #402 of owb-site-production started > build #402 of owb-site-production is c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.0

t > > [+0] meh, don’t care > > [-1] stop, because of ${blocker} > > > > The VOTE is open for 72h > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > PS: if you like to build it from source yourself then you also need to > add > > the staging repo for xbean-4.3. The xbean release already got enough +1 > but > > the 72h are not yet over… > -- Best regard, Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

p > > > > [+1] ship it > > [+0] meh, don’t care > > [-1] stop, because of ${blocker} > > > > The VOTE is open for 72h > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > -- > Adam Cornett > adam.corn...@gmail.com > (678) 296-1150 > -- Best regard, Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-1.6.2

> [+0] meh don't care > [-1] nope, because ${reason} > > The VOTE is open for 72h. > > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > -- Best regard, Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

log > >> >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress > > Blog > >> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > > Tomitriber > >> >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > >> >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >> >>> > >> >>> 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament > > : > >> >>> > >> >>>> Hey guys > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2 > > spec jar. I'm > >> >>>> wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based > > on the changes > >> > in > >> >>>> CDI 2. I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its > > pretty heavy on > >> >>>> javadocs. I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm > > seeing in here. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to > > build the JAR? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> John > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > -- Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ http://www.tomitribe.com http://www.tomitribe.io

Build problem

g/components/ref/2.2.1/maven-core/apidocs/org/apache/maven/project/DependencyResolutionException.html [2] https://maven.apache.org/ref/3.0/maven-core/apidocs/org/apache/maven/project/DependencyResolutionException.html -- Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ http://www.tomitribe.com http://www.tomitribe.io

Re: do an OWB release?

k > > > > > > lg > > > reini > > > > > > > > > > Am 27.07.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Mark Struberg > > > >: > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Are there anything we need before shipping the next owb release? > > > > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > > strub > > > > > > > > > -- Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ http://www.tomitribe.com http://www.tomitribe.io

Re: CDI 2.0

il.com> wrote: > Hi . > > When start the implementation for CDI 2.0 in OpenWebBeans? > Exists a date for started? > > I want work for help. > > Marcelo > -- Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ https://tomitribe.com https://tomitribe.io

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4

+1 Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ On Jul 8, 2017 7:19 PM, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" wrote: > +1 > > Le sam. 8 juil. 2017 à 19:42, Gerhard Petracek a > écrit : > > > +1 > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > 2017-0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0

+1 Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ On Jul 10, 2017 9:41 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.4

+1 2018-02-19 13:09 GMT-03:00 Reinhard Sandtner : > +1 > > src builds > LICENSE fine > NOTICE fine > md5, sha1 ok > gpg fine > > tested with meecrowave and my small test app and everything works fine > > lg > reini > > > Am 19.02.2018 um 10:54 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > +1 too > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.5

+1 2018-04-28 9:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > I did run all required tasks for shipping an OWB-1.7.5 release. > This version targets CDI-1.2 / EE7 and would fit for the TomEE-7.x line. > > The following tickets got resolved > > Bug > > • [OWB-1197] - OwbSWClassLoader create

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5

+1 2018-04-29 5:18 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg : > My own +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 29.04.2018 um 09:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > +1 > > > > Le 29 avr. 2018 03:27, "Joseph Bergmark" a écrit : > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Mark Struberg > > >> wrote: > >>

Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Hi Folks, we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we need the backport for it: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13 Please take a look at those changes and let me know what do you think. Thank you. -- Daniel "soro" Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

in.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:20, Daniel Cunha a écrit > : > > > Hi Folks, > > > > we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we ne

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :) Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha escreveu: > Hi Romain, > > Well... that change make me possible to continue create my singleton > startup like it: > > import javax.annotation.

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

kedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha a écrit > : > > > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK1

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Hi Romain, So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see something to be changed? Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha Hi Romain, > > You right, the backport include other things which are important as well > like: > changes on NormalScopeProx

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

awerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

to apply it without > migrating to asm7? > > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha < > daniels...@apache.org>: > > > Hi Romain, > > > > Do we have plan to merge it? > > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau < > &

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

20. Nov. 2018 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha < > daniels...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11 (officially) on OWB > > 1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well. > > > > Em

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Hi Thomas, I've updated the patch[1], please review it. Thank you. [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13 Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha escreveu: > Hi Thomas, > > sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch. > > Em ter, 20 de nov

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

gt; > a écrit : > > > > > @Romain could you do a short review? I could apply it tomorrow then. > > > > > > Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha < > > > daniels...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > >

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

hi folks, patch updated again: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13 :) Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 08:14, Daniel Cunha escreveu: > Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update the patch. > > Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

> > > > not sure if i didn't understand it correclty but IMO we should upgrade > to > > > ASM7 - BUT - default the bytecode version to Java6 or Java7 in > > > AbstractProxyFactory#determineDefaultJavaVersion. > > > Could you please clarify

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

Ok. patch updated again. :) Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:32, Daniel Cunha escreveu: > Ah.. > > Ok, I get it! > Thanks Thomas and Jon > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:30, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> I thin

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

then? > > Am Sa., 1. Dez. 2018 um 17:14 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Yes, looks good > > > > Le sam. 1 déc. 2018 14:28, Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > a écrit : > > &g

Release for OWB 1.7.6

Hi guys, We did some fixes on the branch owb_1.7.x and we I believe a good idea to release out 1.7.6 for update it on TomEE 7.0.x and 7.1.x What do you think? -- Daniel "soro" Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Release for OWB 1.7.6

gt; > > > > > > Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 22:15, Mark Struberg > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > Am 04.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.9

+1 Em seg, 17 de dez de 2018 às 11:50, Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu: > - tests in my applications are fine > - build is fine > - checksum matches > - signature is fine > > +1 > > Am Mo., 17. Dez. 2018 um 10:38 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

ca do it whenever it's needed this week. > > > > Le lun. 3 déc. 2018 à 11:13, Daniel Cunha a > écrit > > : > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Sure, I'll close. > > > Thank you too! > > > > > > Em seg, 3 de de

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.6

+1 Em seg, 17 de dez de 2018 2:04 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com escreveu: > Hi community, > > I'd like to call a vote for the openwebbeans maintenance release 1.7.6. > > Improvement > >- [OWB-1266 ] - [perf] >InjectionReso

Meecrowave Proxy

Hi folks, I'm trying configure a proxy with meecrowave, I can see the test working fine: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/blob/master/meecrowave-proxy/src/test/java/org/apache/meecrowave/proxy/servlet/ProxyServletTest.java I'm try creating a route like: { "id": "example-route"

Re: Meecrowave Proxy

ub < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 17:20, Daniel Cunha a > écrit : > >

Re: Meecrowave Proxy

with a empty list like: "skippedHeaders": []. same behavior for cookies. [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/blob/master/meecrowave-proxy/src/main/java/org/apache/meecrowave/proxy/servlet/front/ProxyServlet.java#L127 Em sex., 20 de dez. de 2019 às 14:15, Daniel Cunha

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.14

+1 Em seg., 13 de jan. de 2020 às 07:38, Reinhard Sandtner < reinhard.sandt...@gmail.com> escreveu: > +1 > > lg > reini > > > Am 11.01.2020 um 16:27 schrieb Mark Struberg >: > > > > Hi folks! > > > > I've run all the tasks to release OWB 2.0.14 > > > > Here is the list of fixed bugs: > > > > Bug

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.15

+1 Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2020 às 06:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofre escreveu: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > > Le 14 févr. 2020 à 09:49, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > As mentionned on the list, here is the release of our beloved (in this > day > > ;)) OWB 2.0.15

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-965: - Attachment: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch > Create index to tomcat-sam

[jira] [Created] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

Daniel Cunha created OWB-965: Summary: Create index to tomcat-sample Key: OWB-965 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-965: - Attachment: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch Added license. > Create index to tomcat-sam

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14019656#comment-14019656 ] Daniel Cunha commented on OWB-965: -- Mark, No rush. When you finish, you can merg

[jira] [Created] (OWB-983) sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run'

Daniel Cunha created OWB-983: Summary: sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run' Key: OWB-983 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-983 Project: OpenWebBeans

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-983) sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-983: - Attachment: OWB-983.patch > sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mv

[jira] [Created] (OWB-989) Clean info issue on Sonar

Daniel Cunha created OWB-989: Summary: Clean info issue on Sonar Key: OWB-989 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Reporter

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-989) Clean info issue on Sonar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-989: - Attachment: OWB-989.patch > Clean info issue on Sonar > - > >

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-989) Clean info issue on Sonar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-989: - Attachment: OWB-989-updated.patch Patch updated. > Clean info issue on So

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1024) DecoratorBeanBuilder : Number of TypeArguments must match - Decorated Type: 2 Delegate Type: 1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14200137#comment-14200137 ] Daniel Cunha commented on OWB-1024: --- Hey Bruno, OWB-992 fixed. Do you still have pro

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1134) Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin

Daniel Cunha created OWB-1134: - Summary: Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin Key: OWB-1134 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134 Project

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1134) Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15363586#comment-15363586 ] Daniel Cunha commented on OWB-1134: --- Patch attached. :) > Upgrade plugins to

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1134) Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-1134: -- Attachment: OWB-1134.patch > Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and >

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1135) Create ResourceBundleFactory

Daniel Cunha created OWB-1135: - Summary: Create ResourceBundleFactory Key: OWB-1135 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1135) Create ResourceBundleFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-1135: -- Attachment: OWB-1135.patch Patch attached. > Create ResourceBundleFact

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1135) Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha updated OWB-1135: -- Summary: Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages (was: Create ResourceBundleFactory) > Rem

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1135) Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha resolved OWB-1135. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.7.4) 2.0.0 > Remove duplicat

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14564175#comment-14564175 ] Daniel Cunha (soro) commented on OWB-654: - Hi folks, Good news. Now, the

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Cunha (soro) updated OWB-654: Attachment: OWB-654.patch > manual lookups of beans with generics f