subject:"Re\: \[VOTE\] Release Apache OpenWebBeans\-1.7.0 \- take 2"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

2016-09-03 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

+1

Le 3 sept. 2016 20:30, "Reinhard Sandtner"  a
écrit :

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> app works fine
> signature ok
> building from src successful
>
> lg
> reini
>
>
>
> > Am 31.08.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > New take for OWB-1.7.0
> >
> > Repo is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> >
> > Source release is
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >
> > You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [+1] let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >>
> >>> No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
> >>> shouldn't.
> >>>
> >>> TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
> >> said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>  On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> 
>  @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it
> >>> is a
>  bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
>  deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
> >>> respect
>  the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both
> >> statements
>  are very compatible).
> 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>  @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>   | Old Wordpress Blog
>   | Github
>   |
>  LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>   | JavaEE Factory
>  
> 
> 
>  2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> >> :
> 
> > -1, because it still breaks
> > org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as
> >> owb
> >>> is
> > used with openejb).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> >> :
> >
> >> Good morning!
> >>
> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> >> OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> The staging repo is:
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>
> >>
> >> The source release can be found at
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>
> >>
> >> My Key can be found in
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>
> >> The tag in SVN is
> >>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>> openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >> Revision r1758342
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [+1] let's ship it!
> >>
> >> [+0] meh, don't care
> >>
> >> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>
> >>
> >> The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

2016-09-03 Thread Reinhard Sandtner

+1 (non-binding)

app works fine
signature ok
building from src successful

lg
reini



> Am 31.08.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Mark Struberg :
> 
> New take for OWB-1.7.0
> 
> Repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> 
> Source release is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> 
> You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> 
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> 
> 
> Here is my +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>  wrote:
>>> 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>> 
>>> No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
>>> shouldn't.
>>> 
>>> TCK passes even after my fix.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
>> said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
 
 @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes it
>>> is a
 bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
 deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
>>> respect
 the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both 
>> statements
 are very compatible).
 
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau  |  Blog
  | Old Wordpress Blog
  | Github
  |
 LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
  | JavaEE Factory
 
 
 
 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek 
>> :
 
> -1, because it still breaks
> org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as 
>> owb
>>> is
> used with openejb).
> 
> regards,
> gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg 
>> :
> 
>> Good morning!
>> 
>> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache 
>> OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>> 
>> 
>> The staging repo is:
>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>> 
>> 
>> The source release can be found at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>> 
>> 
>> My Key can be found in
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>> 
>> The tag in SVN is
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
>>> openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>> Revision r1758342
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [+1] let's ship it!
>> 
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> 
>> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>> 
>> 
>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>> 
>> 
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

2016-09-02 Thread Joseph Bergmark

+1

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> New take for OWB-1.7.0
>
> Repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
>
> Source release is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>
> You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
>
>
>
>
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place where we
> >>  shouldn't.
> >>
> >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>
> >>
> > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control - that
> > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>  LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and standalone)
> >>  >
> >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request scopes
> it
> >>  is a
> >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be fixed in
> >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl doesn't
> >>  respect
> >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and both
> > statements
> >>  > are very compatible).
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  >  | Old Wordpress Blog
> >>  >  | Github
> >>  >  |
> >>  > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> >>  > 
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> > :
> >>  >
> >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest (as soon as
> > owb
> >>  is
> >>  >>  used with openejb).
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  regards,
> >>  >>  gerhard
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > :
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
> >>  >>  > strub
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

2016-09-02 Thread Thomas Andraschko

+1 - my applications are working fine

2016-09-01 10:50 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed
> release numbers
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Wordpress Blog
>  | Github  rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-09-01 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
>
> > 1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> > > validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> > >
> > > Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg"
> > >  a écrit :
> > >
> > >>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
> > >>
> > >>  Repo is
> > >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> > >>
> > >>  Source release is
> > >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> > >>
> > >>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  [+1] let's ship it!
> > >>  [+0] meh, don't care
> > >>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  The VOTE is open for 72h
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  Here is my +1
> > >>
> > >>  txs and LieGrue,
> > >>  strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > > :
> > >>  >
> > >>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place
> > > where we
> > >>  >>  shouldn't.
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control
> > > - that
> > >>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> > >>  >
> > >>  >
> > >>  >
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  LieGrue,
> > >>  >>  strub
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and
> > > standalone)
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request
> > > scopes
> > >>  it
> > >>  >>  is a
> > >>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be
> > > fixed in
> > >>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl
> > > doesn't
> > >>  >>  respect
> > >>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and
> > > both
> > >>  > statements
> > >>  >>  > are very compatible).
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>  >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >>  >>  >  | Old Wordpress
> > > Blog
> > >>  >>  >  | Github
> > >>  >>  >  |
> > >>  >>  > LinkedIn  |
> > > Tomitriber
> > >>  >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> > >>  >>  > 
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> > >>  > :
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> > >>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest
> > > (as soon as
> > >>  > owb
> > >>  >>  is
> > >>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>  regards,
> > >>  >>  >>  gerhard
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > >>  > :
> > >>  >>  >>
> > >>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> > >>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> > >>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> > >>  >>  >>  >
> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

2016-09-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed
release numbers


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Wordpress Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-09-01 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :

> 1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> > validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> >
> > Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> >
> >
> > Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg"
> >  a écrit :
> >
> >>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
> >>
> >>  Repo is
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> >>
> >>  Source release is
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>
> >>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>
> >>
> >>  The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  Here is my +1
> >>
> >>  txs and LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > :
> >>  >
> >>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place
> > where we
> >>  >>  shouldn't.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control
> > - that
> >>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  LieGrue,
> >>  >>  strub
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and
> > standalone)
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request
> > scopes
> >>  it
> >>  >>  is a
> >>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be
> > fixed in
> >>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl
> > doesn't
> >>  >>  respect
> >>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and
> > both
> >>  > statements
> >>  >>  > are very compatible).
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  >>  >  | Old Wordpress
> > Blog
> >>  >>  >  | Github
> >>  >>  >  |
> >>  >>  > LinkedIn  |
> > Tomitriber
> >>  >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> >>  > :
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest
> > (as soon as
> >>  > owb
> >>  >>  is
> >>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  regards,
> >>  >>  >>  gerhard
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> >>  > :
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> >>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>  >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

2016-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg

1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.






> On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>  wrote:
> > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> 
> Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> 
> 
> Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg" 
>  a écrit :
> 
>>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
>> 
>>  Repo is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
>> 
>>  Source release is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>> 
>>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  [+1] let's ship it!
>>  [+0] meh, don't care
>>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>> 
>> 
>>  The VOTE is open for 72h
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  Here is my +1
>> 
>>  txs and LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg 
> :
>>  >
>>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place 
> where we
>>  >>  shouldn't.
>>  >>
>>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control 
> - that
>>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >>
>>  >>  LieGrue,
>>  >>  strub
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and 
> standalone)
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request 
> scopes
>>  it
>>  >>  is a
>>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be 
> fixed in
>>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl 
> doesn't
>>  >>  respect
>>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and 
> both
>>  > statements
>>  >>  > are very compatible).
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  >>  > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  >>  >  | Old Wordpress 
> Blog
>>  >>  >  | Github
>>  >>  >  |
>>  >>  > LinkedIn  | 
> Tomitriber
>>  >>  >  | JavaEE Factory
>>  >>  > 
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
>>  > :
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
>>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest 
> (as soon as
>>  > owb
>>  >>  is
>>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  regards,
>>  >>  >>  gerhard
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
>>  > :
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
>>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  >>  > 
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
>>  >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>  >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
>>  >>  >>  > strub
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >
>>  >>
>>  >
>> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

6 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information