[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #30 from Sachin --- Hi PJ Fanning in perticular do i need to use this link https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader-sample/blob/main/src/main/java/com/github/pjfanning/poi/sample/StreamingRead.java please tell me this

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #29 from PJ Fanning --- https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader supports OOXML strict format files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #28 from Sachin --- Hi Asbjørn S. if you know which one to use can you pls help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #27 from Sachin --- Hi @PJ Fanning i am getting Strict OOXML isn't currently supported error for line in my code 'Workbook wb = WorkbookFactory.create(inputStream)' i want to get rid of this. You said ur codde is doing this but i

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #26 from PJ Fanning --- ndavies asked about Tika - and Tika only reads files to extract text - so excel-streaming-reader could be used to do this. Anybody who wants to support writing ooxml-strict files are welcome to write code

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #25 from Asbjørn S. --- As I understand it, your program converts Strict spreadsheets to Transitional spreadsheets. Getting rid of Strict doesn't really mean it supports Strict. It just gets rid of it so the rest of the processing

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #24 from PJ Fanning --- I don't think there is any appetite among POI developers to take this on. One option would be to raise a Tika issue about them supporting https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader - it has support

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #23 from ndav...@turnitin.com --- Just found this issue and wanted to add another use case. We are using Tika, which uses POI, to extract plain text from MS files, including xlsx, docx etc. Some of these fall foul to this issue. It

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #22 from Asbjørn S. --- (In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #20) > Asbjorn - supporting strict ooxml strict format is a massive task. poi-ooxml > uses generated classes based on the OOXML Transitional XSDs. Generating the > same

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #21 from Asbjørn S. --- (In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #19) > Thanks Asbjorn. Could you read https://poi.apache.org/devel/guidelines.html > and in particular, the piece about Microsoft NDAs? If you have any > non-public info

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #20 from PJ Fanning --- Asbjorn - supporting strict ooxml strict format is a massive task. poi-ooxml uses generated classes based on the OOXML Transitional XSDs. Generating the same classes for OOXML Strict XSDs and then having the

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #19 from PJ Fanning --- Thanks Asbjorn. Could you read https://poi.apache.org/devel/guidelines.html and in particular, the piece about Microsoft NDAs? If you have any non-public info - possibly even private emails with a Microsoft

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 Asbjørn S. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@sa.dk -- You are receiving this

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #18 from Asbjørn S. --- Hello I am in contact with MS about adding OOXML Strict conformance validation to their OOXML Validator (the respository is however hosted personally by an MS developer and it might in fact not be official

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #17 from PJ Fanning --- Hi Sebastian - supporting Strict OOXML format is a big undertaking and my impression is that this format has not really taken off (there aren't too many people asking about it). If you read my comment from

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #16 from Sebastian Böhm --- Good Morning, I like to contribute to the support of strict OOXML files (as I want to get rid of my workaround scripts). What is the current state? Are there already some changes/progress in any branch?

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #15 from PJ Fanning --- There is some basic support in excel-streaming-reader, documented at https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader#ooxml-strict-format -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thtjf2...@naver.com --- Comment #14

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 sm4...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sm4...@gmail.com --- Comment #13

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #12 from Piotr Wilkin --- Yeah, which is why I was asking :> there were some partial results done by some people, I'll see if something can be done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #11 from Dominik Stadler --- No, it seems none of the contributors needs it urgently enough to warrant spending time on it. As this is a purely community supported project without commercial backing, your best bet to get progress

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 --- Comment #10 from Piotr Wilkin --- Over two years have passed - has there been any work done on this / any milestone? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 twilc...@widen.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||twilc...@widen.com -- You are

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 Dominik Stadler changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35988|Engineering portfolio |spam description|

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 tmasoch...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tmasoch...@gmail.com ---

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 Matafagafo changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 Sergei Malafeev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 57699] Support Strict OOXML files

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Suport Strict OOXML files |Support Strict OOXML