At Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:23:54 -0500, Casey Klein wrote:
> `define-for-syntax' doesn't allow optional or keyword arguments,
> although the documentation suggests it should.
>
> I tried to fix this myself, but I'm getting a mysterious compile error.
> [...]
> collects/racket/private/kw.rkt:708:46: com
Hi, the dev repository page linied from
http://racket-lang.org/community.html
is erroring (in ff 3.6.3)
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://git.racket-lang.org/
Line Number 7, Column 117:function padLeftStr(input,width,str){var
prefix='';width-=input.toString().length;while(width>0
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:23:54 -0500, Casey Klein wrote:
>> `define-for-syntax' doesn't allow optional or keyword arguments,
>> although the documentation suggests it should.
>>
>> I tried to fix this myself, but I'm getting a mysterious compile
The release of Racket has prompted some web discussion, which might be
instructive to anyone thinking about our "marketing".
On Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/Racket/duplicates/ccf0w/announcing_racket/
On Hacker News: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1411265 and
http://news.ycombinator.com/ite
2010/6/9 Sam Tobin-Hochstadt :
> 4. We should have a "Try Racket in the browser" link, like this:
> http://tryruby.org/
Perhaps the IRC-bot thingie could be used as a starting point?
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
>> Yes, Carl got my point right. And yes, that's like showing square brackets
>> in the stepper ;)
>
> Right now, the two cases are slightly asymmetric, since there's a
> syntax propert
The top of the current bug report page currently says:
"See the Racket site for up-to-date information, because PLT Scheme is
now Racket. (Why?) This page is for compatiblity and historical
reference only."
We should probably have a bug report site that gives users a little
more confidence. (Sor
On Jun 9, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> (Sorry if this is old news and I missed that someone is already
> working on it.)
You did.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
__
8 matches
Mail list logo