You could put all the requires into one file and then re-export
things? (At least for now.) Also, you can end up exporting too much,
ie unsafe-call-with-current-continuation :).
Robby
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:20 PM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>
Can we please not have this?? The whole point of having uniform names
is that you can use require/provide things easily so there's no need
for a library.
In addition, the usual way things went so far was to write safe code,
and then "turn on" unsafely by adding requires with dropping the
prefix,
On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Can we please not have this?? The whole point of having uniform names
> is that you can use require/provide things easily so there's no need
> for a library.
Sure, I don't feel strongly about it. Done.
To be clear, my use case is this: I'm tr
An hour ago, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > Can we please not have this?? The whole point of having uniform names
> > is that you can use require/provide things easily so there's no need
> > for a library.
>
> Sure, I don't feel strongly about it
On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour ago, John Clements wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>>> Can we please not have this?? The whole point of having uniform names
>>> is that you can use require/provide things easily so there's no need
>>>
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~rafkind/tmp/lines.png
This is not yet enabled, to see it change (show-line-numbers?) to #t. I
don't know how to add menu options and configuration stuff off-hand, if
anyone can whip it up quickly go for it, otherwise it will take me some
extra time to figure it out.
I want to read a chunk from the middle of a 50-megabyte file. As far as I can
see, there are no random-access file primitives currently in DrRacket. Also, I
don't see a "skip-bytes", so it looks like I should be allocating a junk buffer
and then repeatedly calling read-bytes to read the skippe
I think you want file-position
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/port-buffers.html#(def._((quote._~23~25kernel)._file-position))
Jay
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:15 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> I want to read a chunk from the middle of a 50-megabyte file. As far as I
> can see, there are no ra
John Clements writes:
> I want to read a chunk from the middle of a 50-megabyte file. As far
> as I can see, there are no random-access file primitives currently in
> DrRacket. Also, I don't see a "skip-bytes", so it looks like I should
> be allocating a junk buffer and then repeatedly calling
9 matches
Mail list logo
