Would this mean equal?, eq?, =, or what? I suppose it would make
sense to be =? since the others have a question mark, but I'd almost
prefer it to be equal? just to save me some typing. (In fact, maybe
I'll bind it to that myself ...). I imagine that this kind of confusion
is, or is related
It would be the same as =, ie, numeric equality. It's not meant to be
some sort of generalized equality checker. It's just that we teach
our students that predicates end in ?, and that's true of symbol=?,
string=?, but not =.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Everett Morse we...@unoc.net wrote:
On 10/6/10 2:24 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
It would be the same as =, ie, numeric equality. It's not meant to be
some sort of generalized equality checker. It's just that we teach
our students that predicates end in ?, and that's true of symbol=?,
string=?, but not =.
So shouldn't it
I was just trying to debug a program today that goes through a series of
complex macros. I used Check Syntax so I can see what variables are
bound where (some of which are syntax variables), and when I got stuck I
wanted to see how the macro reduces. I clicked the macro stepper, and
it spun
On 10/06/2010 12:37 PM, Everett Morse wrote:
I was just trying to debug a program today that goes through a series of
complex macros. I used Check Syntax so I can see what variables are
bound where (some of which are syntax variables), and when I got stuck I
wanted to see how the macro reduces.
30 minutes ago, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
Okay, folks -- enough email on plt-edu. If you want to follow-up,
please take it to plt-edu-discuss.
Related to this, I have a general request:
-
Please do not cross-post emails
This came out a while ago, and I forgot to forward it. The server is
now using git 1.7.3.1.
---BeginMessage---
The latest feature release Git 1.7.3 is available at the usual
places:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/
git-1.7.3.tar.{gz,bz2}(source tarball)
8 minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
So, it looks like planet is broken wrt planet-links containing
symbolic links. Maybe you could solve this by just putting a
fully-expand-path-mumble somewhere very early in the signal chain?
... Hmm, actually that might not be such a great idea; you break
Typed Racket's type-driven optimizer is now turned on by default.
The #:optimize switch that was previously used to turn the optimizer
on has been kept around for backward compatibility, but is now a
no-op. A #:no-optimize switch has been added, in case you want to turn
the optimizer off (e.g.
9 matches
Mail list logo
