Thanks. If you don't need places, compiling with places disabled (i.e.,
`configure --disable-places') would likely work around the bug for now.
At Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:18:15 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> It uses only a single place. The system is 32bit Linux:
> Linux 2.6.32.59-0.7-pae #1 SMP 2012-0
It uses only a single place. The system is 32bit Linux:
Linux 2.6.32.59-0.7-pae #1 SMP 2012-07-13 15:50:56 +0200 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
Tobias
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:17:05 +0200, Matthew Flatt
wrote:
It looks like we still have problems with the `subprocess'
implementation that coope
It looks like we still have problems with the `subprocess'
implementation that cooperates with places.
Does your program use multiple places, or just one? If it uses multiple
places, does it use `subprocess' in multiple places?
Is your platform 32-bit Linux?
At Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:38:23 +0200, T
Hi,
i am experiencing random crashes when using subprocess followed by a
subprocess-wait. My test program, that i call via subprocess is special,
in that it kills itself very fast with a sigkill after executing.
Unfortunately, i wasn't able to reproduce this behavior in a small sample
but i coul
4 matches
Mail list logo
