I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just put the whole tests collection there.)
I'm not sure about compiling tests for the purposes of dependency
checking. It sounds ok, but I have a feeling that I'm forgetting some
reason that we disabled compilation
I believe the reason we disabled compilation was that tests weren't
constrained to depend only on the core. Some tests may use planet
packages, etc. Originally, this was mostly for rackunit, which was a
planet package. This suggests to me that we should (a) remove the test
packages from the
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just put the whole tests collection there.)
Sorry, I should have been more specific; 'tests/racket/stx.rktl' depends on
htdp. I expect that the tests
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just put the whole tests collection there.)
Sorry, I should have been more
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure that racket-test needs to be split up. (For the
initial cut, I just
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I'm
Another variation, if you're thinking about cloud infrastructure today:
you could pretty easily make your own faux PLaneT server that either is
for a single app or takes the identity/profile of the app as part of the
URL the app uses to access the PLaneT server.
The faux server can be a tiny
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
It's good to see interest in Racket from cloud people. Feel free to ask
lots of questions on the Racket users and dev email lists as you work
through your solution.
Well, this a side-interest for personally, but
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I think that a minor variation on Neil's strategy should not be too
difficult to do (but I'll certainly agree that it is not an ideal
situation). What you'd do is first just download (via the Bam method
below :)
Daniel Farina wrote at 12/29/2011 07:59 PM:
The goal is that a program written, say, three
years ago should be able to run the same way it did when it was
written, so it's really useful to freeze all the dependencies into the
file system somehow and preserve it.
Someone else can comment on
10 matches
Mail list logo
