Thank you @Carlos Rovira
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:09 PM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> this is from [1]
>
> Browser Support for ES5 (2009)
> BrowserVersionFrom Date
> Chrome 23 Sep 2012
> Firefox 21 Apr 2013
> IE 9* Mar 2011
> IE / Edge 10 Sep 2012
> Safari 6 Jul 2012
> Opera 15 Jul
Hi Andrew,
this is from [1]
Browser Support for ES5 (2009)
BrowserVersionFrom Date
Chrome 23 Sep 2012
Firefox 21 Apr 2013
IE 9* Mar 2011
IE / Edge 10 Sep 2012
Safari 6 Jul 2012
Opera 15 Jul 2013
[1] https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_versions.asp
El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:31, Andrew Wetmore
Yes, I feel a little bit like a guest at some other group's dinner party.
Any thoughts on the minimum versions of the various browsers that we
support?
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:27 AM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:14, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
> >
> >
Hi Andrew,
El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:14, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:
>
> Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
> Builder had?
>
Yeah, you're right. I was thinking about "layouts" feature, but is really
what you say.
The problem with this grids is that
It is a start, at least.
Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
Builder had?
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:00 AM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Many Thanks Andrew, I think is a good start.
> Looking at the tables, sometimes is difficult to see if we fit in a cell or
> another,
Many Thanks Andrew, I think is a good start.
Looking at the tables, sometimes is difficult to see if we fit in a cell or
another, but we can get over it as we released next version. For now I
think is ok, and the initial objetive is to be listed :)
Thanks!
El sáb., 3 ago. 2019 a las 22:47,
Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom) : Yes, AMF
GUI page layout:YES
El vie., 2 ago. 2019 a las 14:46, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:
> This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a
> given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache
>
Hi Andrew,
Apache Royale is ES5 right now. So there you should put the version where
the browser started to support ES5.
In the case of Jewel in TDJ I added with versions are supported since I
tested with Browserstack the minimum version for Jewel [1]
[1]
I have added columns and rows for Apache Royale to this page [1], and have
made a stab at providing data in the cells. I am sure I have missed a bunch
of features we can say YES about, and do not have anything for the earliest
versions of each browser Royale works with, so any improvements anyone
This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a
given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache
Royale?:
Feature detection:
DOM wrapped:
Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES
Web socket
Server push data retrieval
Other data retrieval (xml, html,
This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is the
earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale (0.9.4)
compiles can work with?
IE
Firefox
Safari
Opera
Chrome
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Yeah! Very important this kind of
Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:
> That be me.
>
> I will take a look at it!
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
That be me.
I will take a look at it!
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I remember
> that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
> Royale ?
>
> [1]
13 matches
Mail list logo
