Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.12.0 RC2

Cloned the release and ran build, test and checkAll.sh All passed. Verified MD5 and the signature. Got warning - "this key is not certified with a trusted signature". I guess it is ok. +1 On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman wrote: > This is a call for

Re: Questions about checkpointing and Kinesis

If you are implementing your own consumer, on start Samza will call register method of the consumer and will pass the offsets. If you are using CheckpointListener (like Jagadish mentioned) you will get a callback on each checkpoint (so you can ignore the register call), otherwise you can use

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.12.0 RC2

, xinyu liu <xinyuliu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ran build, checkAll and integration tests. All passed. > > > > +1 non-binding. > > > > Thanks, > > Xinyu > > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Boris S <bor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] SEP-1: Semantics of ProcessorId in Samza

+1 Looks good to me. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:00 PM, xinyu liu wrote: > +1 on my side. Very happy to see this proposal. This is a blocker for > integrating fluent API with StreamProcessor, and hopefully we can get it > resolved soon :). > > Thanks, > Xinyu > > On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Samza Logo

Voted. I like the orbital one and the dotted 'S'. Red is not my preferred color, but Samza has been associated with red for a long time, so I don't see any reason for changing it. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Navina Ramesh < nram...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > @Renato: > Thanks for your

Re: [Discuss] Samza 0.13.1 release

+1 for the release. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Yi Pan wrote: > +1 for the list! Let's proceed! > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Ignacio Solis wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jacob Maes > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

I think we need to add SAMZA-1286 and SAMZA-1279 to the release . On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman wrote: > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.13.0. Thanks to > everyone who has contributed to this release. We are very glad to see

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache Samza 0.12.0 RC2

gt; I don't think they are a blocker, it's some characters not being able > > to > > > be > > > > parsed when doing the scalaCompile task for the samza-hdfs component. > > Is > > > it > > > > worth opening a JIRA to fix this? > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC2

Downloaded, ran build and test and integration tests on Linux RedHat. Integration tests passed (using python 2.7). +1 (non-binding) On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman wrote: > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.13.0. Thanks to >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC6

+1 (non-binding) build and tested on Linux (with python 2.7; 2.4 and 3.5 - didn't work) On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Jacob Maes wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Built and tested on both OSX and RHEL with gradle 2.0 and 2.2 respectively. > > Also verified the high level API

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.1 RC0

Hi, I've downloaded and built it on Linux. Ran unit and integration tests. All passed. The only issue I've encountered was a version of python. Version below 2.5 and above 3 all failed. 2.7 was the only version that worked. +1 (non binding) On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Fred Haifeng Ji

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.14.0 RC3

Verified signature. Ran unit and integration tests. As usual had to force python to 2.7 for integration tests to run on Linux. +1 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:01 AM, xinyu liu wrote: > Correction: This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza > *0.14.0*. > > On

Re: [Discuss] Samza 0.14.1 release

Sure. Let's do it. On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Xinyu Liu wrote: > Thanks everyone for the discussion! I marked the Kafka 0.11 upgrade ticket > as 0.14.1 and will include it in this release. Now we have 3 binding votes > from Jagadish, Yi and Jake, so I will go ahead

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.14.1 RC2

verified signature and md5 ran check-all.sh successfully ran few SQL queries from the tutorial +1 (binding) On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Xinyu Liu wrote: > Hi, All, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.14.1. Thanks to > everyone who has

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.14.0 RC5

Verified the signature. Ran build, tests and integration tests on Unix. All passed (as before requires python 2.7, neither higher nor lower). +1 Thanks guys !! On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:50 PM, xinyu liu wrote: > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza

SEP-11. Host Affinity in standalone discussion.

Shanthoosh, Thank you for suggesting and submitting this SEP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75957309 Couple of things I would want to point out so far: 1. Kudos on cleaning up the interface and introducing new ones (LocalityInfo and LocalityManager). I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.0.0 RC2

Ran build, test and integration test on Linux. Verified the signatures. +1 On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:55 AM Prateek Maheshwari wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.0.0. Thanks to > everyone who has contributed to this release. > > The release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.0.0 RC4

ran check-all and integration tests. All passed. verified signatures. +1 On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:15 PM Jagadish Venkatraman wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.0.0. Thanks to > everyone who has contributed to this release. > > The release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Migration of Samza git repo to gitbox.apache.org

+1. Thanks! On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:53 AM santhosh venkat < santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:10 AM Jake Maes wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:35 PM santhosh venkat < > > santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.1.0 RC2

Sorry for the late reply. I've ran into a problem with the performance tests: ./gradlew samza-shell:kvPerformanceTest -PconfigPath=file://$PWD/samza-test/src/main/config/perf/kv-perf.properties I think it is not a code problem, but a test problem, specifically test configuration problem. On Mon,

[DISCUSS] 1.2 release

Hi all, We have added a number of major features and changes to master since 1.1 that warrants a new 1.2 release. Within LinkedIn, some of these features have already been tested as part of our test suites. We plan to continue our testing in coming week to validate the stability prior to

Canceled. [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.2.0 RC0

-- Forwarded message - From: Bharath Kumara Subramanian Date: Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:53 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.2.0 RC0 To: -1 disapprove. We have a bug fix for Async API. The fix has been committed to master

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2 release

: > I don't think we did anything for "Making sendTo(table), sendTo(stream) > non-terminal". The ticket was just closed as a "won't fix" IIRC. > > Nevertheless, I think the Kafka 2.0 upgrade warrants a release by itself. > > Let's do it. > > On Fri, May 17, 2

Re: MessageStream with multiple concurrent operation stacks

Yes, to answer your second question , you should be able to fork the streams. Message Streams are idempotent and can be used in different pipelines. With regards to group id, Samza does set the group ids, but, I think, they are the same for the whole job. The idea behind it is, that Samza is not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.4.0 RC0

Hi, Currently it doesn't build if one to follow README file. We discussed it with Cameron, and the reason is that running 'gradle -b bootstrap.gradle' brings in gradle5.*, while the gradle files we have are for 4.* Cameron is looking into fixing this situation. -1 On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:59 PM

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.4.0 RC1

Tests and integration tests (on linux) passed. +1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:28 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian < codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1(binding). > > Check-all.sh and the integration tests passed. > > Thanks, > Bharath > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:35 PM Xinyu Liu wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Samza 1.5.1 release

+1 On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:02 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian < codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In 1.5 release, we enabled transactional state by default for all samza > jobs. We identified a critical bug related to trimming the state which > requires a minor release. > > I wanted

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.5.1 RC0

I've ran check-all.sh and validated all the signatures and hashes. All passed. +1. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:09 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian < codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.5.1. We are > releasing 1.5.1 to address a

Re: [VOTE] SEP-22: Container Placements in Samza

Hi, LGTM. +1. On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:28 AM Sanil Jain wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on SEP-22: Container Placements in Samza > > Thanks to everyone who reviewed the proposal and > provided feedback. > > I have addressed comments on the SEP, and I am not aware of any further

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.5.0 RC1

+1 (binding) - verified signatures - ran check-all - ran integration tests. On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:16 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian < codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.5.0. We are > excited to see some new features

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC1

Quick reminder, Please take some time to validate the release and vote on it. Thanks, Boris. On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:13 PM Boris S wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.6.0. We are > excited to see some new features and improvements in

[VOTE] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC1

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.6.0. We are excited to see some new features and improvements in this release. The release candidate can be downloaded from here: http://people.apache.org/~boryas/samza-1.6.0-rc1/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC0

Hi all, We found an issue with one of the fixes in the current release. This Release candidate is canceled. We will send another release candidate shortly. Boris. On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:04 PM Boris S wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza

[VOTE] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC0

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.6.0. We are excited to see some new features and improvements in this release. The release candidate can be downloaded from here: http://people.apache.org/~boryas/samza-1.6.0-rc0/ The release candidate is signed with pgp key

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC0

Hi all, A quick reminder to vote on the 1.6 release for Samza. There are a lot of fixes and improvements in this release and it should be available for all to use. Thanks, Boris. On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:04 PM Boris S wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apa

[DISCUSS] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC0

** with correct subject this time** Hi all, We have added a number of major features and changes to master since 1.5, that warrants a major 1.6 release. Within LinkedIn, some of these features have already been tested as part of our test suites. We plan to continue our testing the coming weeks

[DISCUSS] Apache Samza 1.5.0 RC0

Hi all, We have added a number of major features and changes to master since 1.5, that warrants a major 1.6 release. Within LinkedIn, some of these features have already been tested as part of our test suites. We plan to continue our testing the coming weeks to validate the stability prior to

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Samza 1.6.0 RC1

The vote for 1.6.0 release has been out for more than 72 hours and we got +1 (binding) x3 (Yi, Bharath, Boris) +1(non-binding) x1 (Stuart Perks) Samza 1.6.0 officially passed the VOTE! Thanks for your contribution to the release and help with validation. -- Boris