Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread nzt48.xin
Hi All I had tested the package, Here is my test scenarios and all of them are woks 1. collector cluster mode + ES 2. collector standalone mode + ES 3. collector standalone mode + H2 Regards Xin Original Message Sender: Sheng Wu Recipient: dev Date: Wednesday, Jun 26, 2019 12:33

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread Hongtao Gao
Hi every Perhaps my feedback is a little late, hope it still useful for us. I focused on oap, k8s and istio. oap is working with k8s cluster module in a GKE env and well integrated with isito mixer adapter, envoy metric service and envoy access log service. The new TTL algorithm is also

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread Yanlong He
+1 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2019年6月29日,09:46,Sheng Wu 写道: > > Hi All, > This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0 > > Release notes: > > * https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/v6.2.0/CHANGES.md#620 > > >

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread kezhenxu94
Hi All, I've checked the following and I'm -1 (no binding) to release 6.2.0 because: the LICENSE of dependency `minimal-json` is not correct in `LICENSE` file[1], neither is it in the dist `LICENSE` file, minimao-json 0.9.5: https://github.com/ralfstx/minimal-json, MIT should be

[VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi All, This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0 Release notes: * https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/v6.2.0/CHANGES.md#620 Release Candidate: *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread kezhenxu94
Since this is not a real license issue (thanks for pointing it out), I’d like to change my vote to +1 (no binding) to release 6.2.0 > On Jun 29, 2019, at 11:46, Sheng Wu wrote: > > Thanks for catching this issue. > > This looks like just a typo for me. Not a real license issue. > > I search

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
My own +1 binding Checked - Compile from source - ACS and SHA512 - LICENSE and NOTICE exist in source and binary tars - Rat checked Sheng Wu Apache Skywalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > 在 2019年6月29日,上午9:46,Sheng Wu 写道: > > Hi All, > This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Thanks for catching this issue. This looks like just a typo for me. Not a real license issue. I search GitHub for minimao(https://github.com/search?q=minimao-json ), there is no such dependency. And license pointer and license file are right, targeting

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread yuguang zhao
Hi All, I tested oap-server in cluster mode using zookeeer, ES as database storage, agent deployed 5 projects, and checked ui display. so I agree with your opinion, to start a vote for 6.2 release. Jian Tan 于2019年6月28日周五 下午11:27写道: > Hi All, > I tested the backend in cluster mode within etcd,

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Thanks all for test feedback. I am cutting the release now. Haoyang Liu You had told me, you are going to test the compatible with .net agent. As we haven't changed anything about that in this version, I will use lazy consensus and prepare the possibility of your -1 in vote(if needed) I will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking version 6.2.0

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Yanlong He Welcome to join the vote. I hope you could follow this doc(https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docs/en/guides/How-to-release.md#vote-check ) to do following steps for release

Feature related PR merge should be hold until INFRA-18665 fixed

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi I used to submit INFRA-18665[1], as we are moving to ASF INFRA. But I think INFRA team close `Require branches to be up to date before merging` by mistake. So, today’s PR would not compare with master, force it `up to date` and run CI, e2e, etc. tests. Which may break the master branch

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread Liu Haoyang
Hi sheng, Sorry, I am late. I have completed the compatibility tests for skywalking 6.2 and .net core agent, and they all work very well. Haoyang Liu On 06/29/2019 09:39,Sheng Wu wrote: Thanks all for test feedback. I am cutting the release now. Haoyang Liu

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Thanks. It is good to know, Service Mesh part and OAP core are good in your tests. Sheng Wu Apache Skywalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > 在 2019年6月29日,上午10:41,Hongtao Gao 写道: > > Hi every > > Perhaps my feedback is a little late, hope it still useful for us. > > I focused on oap, k8s and

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi All I have used updated demo env to do tests, which deployed in cluster mode with ES storage. All located issues have been fixed. Work as expected. I am +1 for release procedure. Sheng Wu Apache Skywalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > 在 2019年6月28日,下午10:08,nzt48.xin 写道: > > Hi All > > >

Re: [Tests required][Prepare for release] SkyWalking 6.2.0 tests

2019-06-28 Thread Jian Tan
Hi All, I tested the backend in cluster mode within etcd, single es node as storage. And checked the rendering of the UI. So,I think and agree with you, it's time to start a vote of 6.2 version release. Sheng Wu 于2019年6月28日周五 下午10:58写道: > Hi All > > I have used updated demo env to do tests,