[PATCH] Trivial test fix

2012-09-01 Thread Liviu Nicoara
Would someone please apply the patch on 4.2.x branch? (I have not yet regained access to my Apache account.) 2012-09-01 Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms * tests/containers/23.bitset.cpp: swapped lines to avoid compiler bug (see

Re: New committers?

2012-09-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 31, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Wojciech Meyer wojciech.me...@googlemail.com wrote: Libstc++ is LGPL therefore can link with GPL project, and can link with ALv2 project, but stdcxx is ALv2 and cannot link with GPL project. That's basically what LGPL was designed for, to solve this problem.

Re: STDCXX forks

2012-09-01 Thread Liviu Nicoara
On 08/31/12 12:20, Stefan Teleman wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: Stefan's seem like a complete git-ification of the whole Apache repository but with no changes I could detect. Not quite. :-) [...] The official Oracle port for Solaris 10 and 11,

Re: [PATCH] Trivial test fix

2012-09-01 Thread Stefan Teleman
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: Would someone please apply the patch on 4.2.x branch? (I have not yet regained access to my Apache account.) 2012-09-01 Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms * tests/containers/23.bitset.cpp: swapped lines to avoid

Re: STDCXX forks

2012-09-01 Thread Liviu Nicoara
On 08/31/12 08:58, C. Bergström wrote: On 08/31/12 07:40 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote: Please correct me if I am wrong. I have seen two forks on github, one belonging to C. Bergstrom/Pathscale and the other to Stefan Teleman. The first one contains a number of genuine code changes outside the

Re: STDCXX forks

2012-09-01 Thread Stefan Teleman
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: Hi Stefan, I have went through the patches. Specifically, I have spent more time looking in the mutex alignment changes and the C++ C library headers patches, and I only read the others. In order: The test extensions

Re: STDCXX forks

2012-09-01 Thread Liviu Nicoara
On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote: On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: [...] This pretty much sums up my first impression. [...] To begin with: the compiler flags/GNUmakefile changes are very specific to the SunPro compilers and to our

Re: Branching policy, 4.3.x, 5.0.0, etc.

2012-09-01 Thread Martin Sebor
On 08/31/2012 12:52 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote: On 08/31/12 14:15, Stefan Teleman wrote: My understanding is that 4.2.x and 4.3.x are bugfix/rfe releases while 5.x would become C++2011. There is an implicitly stated