[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-10-12 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 @hsun-cnnxty Sorry I lost tracking this. From the last time I tested on my local machine (via ThroughputVsLatency), before patching this works better than after patching this. My test

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-09-30 Thread hsun-cnnxty
Github user hsun-cnnxty commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 Tests are done to compare following two code bases: - baseline: current head of 1.x-branch (62476f5237a72938c1f0d3fe65dbcdc446a2bd12) - netty 4.1.x: 1.x-branch-netty4

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-09-30 Thread hsun-cnnxty
Github user hsun-cnnxty commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 @HeartSaVioR I rebased to 1.x-branch and also squashed the commits. Will attached the performance test results soon. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-09-29 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 Please rebase and force push accordingly. Your PR now has all of the commits from other side. You can give it an another try: 1) create new branch based on recent master or 1.x 2)

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-09-22 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 Since Netty made 3.x version line EOL, I'd like to bump Netty to 4.0.x or even 4.1.x if there's no performance / resource usage issue. @hsun-cnnxty Please upmerge this. If you

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-08-03 Thread hsun-cnnxty
Github user hsun-cnnxty commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 @satishd nett 4.x has removed auto-flush in write() and it requires user to explicitly call flush() or writeAndFlush(), so we need to flush for the last message in the logic flow. Fortunately,

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-08-02 Thread satishd
Github user satishd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 @hsun-cnnxty `Channel#write` is modified to `Channel#writeAndFlush` at multiple places. Does not that flush to the underlying stream without buffering and flush it when buffers are full? --- If

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-07-31 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 You can close and reopen this PR to retrigger. Btw, apache repository seems to be unstable recent days. I saw other build failures due to repository connectivity issue. --- If your project is

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-07-30 Thread hsun-cnnxty
Github user hsun-cnnxty commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 Seems the Travis CI build will fail at random places which are not related to this PR. For example the last build failed due to `[ERROR] Failed to execute goal

[GitHub] storm issue #1591: STORM-1038: Upgrade netty to 4.x in 1.x-branch

2016-07-30 Thread hsun-cnnxty
Github user hsun-cnnxty commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1591 Performance test results are attached here. [perf_compare_netty_3vs4_1.x-branch.zip](https://github.com/apache/storm/files/392165/perf_compare_netty_3vs4_1.x-branch.zip) Baseline: