[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2017-09-25 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 I've crafted rebased version of this patch to #2343. I've pinged to @nilday for some period but didn't receive feedback so I thought it's OK to take it over with preserving the credit. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2017-06-28 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 @nilday Sure, please take your time. Thanks for keeping interest of contributing. :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2017-06-28 Thread nilday
Github user nilday commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 @HeartSaVioR I'll rebase it as soon as I can. As the storm-core has been restructured, it may take a while. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2017-06-28 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 This feature looks like good thing to adopt. If @nilday is still willing to adopt this to the Storm codebase, I'd like to spend some time to review this as well. @nilday Could you rebase

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-12-08 Thread nilday
Github user nilday commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 As soon as I find out that nimbus has been transferred to Java, I start to work on this again. The blacklist scheduler has been working on our production environment(Storm v1.0.1) for several months

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-27 Thread nilday
Github user nilday commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 Thanks for you all guys. I will consider seriously all your suggestions. But currently I'll be still working on 1.0.x branch ,since my company has just update to 1.0 version and master branch is

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-22 Thread nilday
Github user nilday commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 @HeartSaVioR not yet, busy with something else. Will do it as soon as I have some time. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-22 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 @nilday Do you have any updates? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-08 Thread knusbaum
Github user knusbaum commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 In addition to the ones @vesense noted, there are many other operators without spaces around them. Adding space around `=`, `+`, `:`, `<`, etc, will make the code more readable. --- If your

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-07 Thread vesense
Github user vesense commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 Thanks @revans2 for the details. get it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-06 Thread knusbaum
Github user knusbaum commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 @revans2 +1 for that. That's simpler to understand and implement. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-06 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 For me either the supervisor works or it does not. If it doesn't work don't use it. If it is slightly better then another supervisor does not tell me much. If too many don't work let someone know

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-06 Thread knusbaum
Github user knusbaum commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 We could just have some "relative badness" heuristic. I would expect the supervisors would be in a bell curve of "goodness/badness" and we can just blacklist the ones in the bad part of the tail,

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-06 Thread vesense
Github user vesense commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 Agree with @revans2 's opinion. Especially, make this feature as a part of nimbus and show the blacklist nodes on the UI. For the third point, I feel we can add a task(eg: `ping` the standby

[GitHub] storm issue #1674: STORM-2083: Blacklist scheduler

2016-09-06 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1674 Overall I like the concept here, and if a supervisor is appearing/disappearing a lot we probably do want to blacklist that supervisor. That said I have a few system concerns. 1) I would