IMHO you may want to deal with rocksdb community directly, not only for
Apache Storm project, but also for various Apache projects (I guess you're
having multiple Apache projects as support targets.)
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:03 AM Yikun Jiang wrote:
> Recently, I do some investigations on the
Sorry for the late reply, I'm on business trip to US this week and missed
this mail at that time.
Maybe we could just start with ARM CI build but just treat it as
"optional", and once we are happy with the ARM CI build result, we could
count it in. If it goes unstable, ignore it again. Does that
Recently, I do some investigations on the arm support for storm project.
The good news is we can build the storm project successfully, but still
have some problem to make the "mvn test" green in arm64 platform, the
mainly problem is that the rocksdbjni(one of the dependency storm projects)
is not
Jungtaek, does the workflow outlined by Yikun work for you?
Den tor. 27. jun. 2019 kl. 18.00 skrev Roshan Naik
:
> Thanks for volunteering.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, 7:08 PM, Yikun Jiang
> wrote:
>
> Yes, we will definitely help to fix ARM test
Thanks for volunteering.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, 7:08 PM, Yikun Jiang wrote:
Yes, we will definitely help to fix ARM test failures in PRs, and the
OpenLab CI will tell us which PR perhaps has ARM compatible problem, if
it's an easy fix problem, I think
Yes, we will definitely help to fix ARM test failures in PRs, and the
OpenLab CI will tell us which PR perhaps has ARM compatible problem, if
it's an easy fix problem, I think authors can fix it by themselves. If not,
we will help them to address it.
For the lack of ARM environment, if the
It sounds pretty low risk for us, if you're volunteering to help fix any
ARM-specific CI failures that may crop up. Will this include helping to fix
ARM test failures in PRs? Most people are unlikely to have an ARM
environment they can use to test, and I'd prefer not to ask contributors to
fix ARM
Sorry for late reply, actually, we have a developer team that willing to
work on this, and I'm the owner of storm ARM CI in the OpenLab team. We not
only want to enable the OpenLab CI, but also want to maintain the arm CI
job and fix the CI issue in Storm project. That means if the storm project
I guess there is no interest in maintaining ARM compatibility, or at least
no one currently wants to take on the effort. Let's not add the Openlab CI
then, we can always do it later if someone expresses interest (and
willingness to maintain).
Den ons. 12. jun. 2019 kl. 17.11 skrev Stig Rohde
Good point, let's see if there's anyone with an ARM environment.
Den tir. 11. jun. 2019 kl. 23.07 skrev Jungtaek Lim :
> I guess the point is not related to open CI build. The point is whether we
> really want to support ARM. I'm seeing OpenLab request for other Apache
> projects as well, so I'd
I guess the point is not related to open CI build. The point is whether we
really want to support ARM. I'm seeing OpenLab request for other Apache
projects as well, so I'd rather not treat their request as commitment of
putting efforts to make builds on ARM green.
I'm a bit hesitant to add some
11 matches
Mail list logo
