Re: Fwd: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
Dario Niedermann wrote on Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:04:03 +0200: > Returning to the original topic, and just to be even clearer: this is > about Subversion NOT RUNNING a script because it has a FLAG FOR THE > SHELL in its SHEBANG LINE. Not because I got the path to bash wrong or > because there is some other error in my script (as should be *OBVIOUS* > from my very first email). There is no need to shout. Mario's theory was entirely plausible: if some command in the script returns non-zero and prints nothing to stderr, that will entirely explains the symptoms you saw, both before and after removing the -e. This relies on knowing that -e to sh means "exit the shell as soon as any command exits non-zero". The minimum example of this theory is: [[[ #!/bin/sh -e false true ]]] Cheers, Daniel
Re: Fwd: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:29:55PM +0200, Dario Niedermann wrote: > That is true. I was mostly wondering if Subversion was (for example) > running hook scripts via /usr/bin/env; so that it's expected for any > flags on the shebang line to cause errors. Or if I'm onto something > and opening a bug is justified. > > Thank you, > DN Subversion uses APR's apr_proc_create to run the hook, with the command type attribute set to APR_PROGRAM (not APR_SHELLCMD!). On Unix, APR then uses execve() to run the program. The relevant code from APR trunk is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/threadproc/unix/proc.c
Re: Fwd: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
Il 12/10/2016 alle 12:18, Stefan Sperling ha scritto: > I don't think it's a very important bug to fix though because there is > an easy workaround. You should be able to work around this by adding: > > set -e > > on the first line of your script. That is true. I was mostly wondering if Subversion was (for example) running hook scripts via /usr/bin/env; so that it's expected for any flags on the shebang line to cause errors. Or if I'm onto something and opening a bug is justified. Thank you, DN
Re: Fwd: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:04:03PM +0200, Dario Niedermann wrote: > The community guide on Subversion's website says it's OK to ask on > dev@ if a report on a possible issue with svn doesn't goes unanswered > on users@. Considering that the only reply I got on users@ was from > someone who completely misread the problem, it seemed to me that the > last-ditch attempt before opening an issue was to report it is dev@. Thank for you for reading the guide! > Returning to the original topic, and just to be even clearer: this is > about Subversion NOT RUNNING a script because it has a FLAG FOR THE > SHELL in its SHEBANG LINE. Not because I got the path to bash wrong or > because there is some other error in my script (as should be *OBVIOUS* > from my very first email). Communication over email is not guaranteed to be loss-free. Some people will always disagree about what's obvious. That's not a problem in itself. It only becomes a problem if you don't have the patience to deal with it. > I was asking if not running a script under these circumstances is > INTENDED BEHAVIOUR for svn or if it might be a BUG IN SUBVERSION. I suppose this could be fixed, yes, so if you like please open issue. I don't think it's a very important bug to fix though because there is an easy workaround. You should be able to work around this by adding: set -e on the first line of your script.
Re: Fwd: [Linux] Hook hashbang hardships
Hi Dario, On 10/12/2016 9:47 AM, Dario Niedermann wrote: > Hi! Having received no relevant replies on users@ in 15 days, I'm > forwarding my message here. Thanks for looking into the issue. > > - Forwarded message from Dario Niedermann- > > Hello! I've been having trouble getting my own pre-revprop-change > hook script to work. Svn was refusing any change to a revprop with > the following error: > > svn: E165001: Revprop change blocked by pre-revprop-change hook > (exit code 1) with no output. > > > Until I found out that the issue was in the script's shebang: > > #!/bin/bash -e > > which wouldn't work. Had to remove ' -e'. Is this expected behaviour > or is there something wrong with svn (version 1.9.4 (r1740329) on > Linux/x86_64) ? > > Thanks, > DN > > - End forwarded message - Forwarding messages to the dev list is not really considered good practice. I see that you got one reply from a user but don't see any reply from your side. That might lead people to assume that the issue was fixed for you and there's no longer any problem. May I suggest you just bump your post on the users list in order to see if someone else picks it up there? Regards, Stefan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature