[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16277480#comment-16277480
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-2516:
--
It sounds like that. That said, why not update the latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-2516:
-
Fix Version/s: 1.17
> Upgrade CFX version to > 3.0.13
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-2516:
-
Summary: Upgrade CFX version to > 3.0.13 (was: Upgade CFX version to >
3.0.13)
> Upgrade CFX
Julian Reschke created TIKA-2516:
Summary: Upgade CFX version to > 3.0.13
Key: TIKA-2516
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2516
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16255592#comment-16255592
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-2486:
--
> Failure to find com.adobe.granite:parent:pom:60"
There are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-2486:
-
Affects Version/s: 1.16
> Upgrade metadata-extractor to 2.10.1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16251563#comment-16251563
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on TIKA-2034 at 11/14/17 3:52 PM:
Unless I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16251563#comment-16251563
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-2034:
--
Unless I'm missing something this should have higher prio and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-2486:
-
Component/s: metadata
> Upgrade metadata-extractor to 2.10.1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16278551#comment-16278551
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-2503:
--
httpclient is now at 4.5.4...
> Try to upgrade httpclient to
Julian Reschke created TIKA-2486:
Summary: Upgrade metadata-extractor to 2.10.1
Key: TIKA-2486
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2486
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-2570:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Tika 1.17 uses vulnerable Jackson version 2.9.2
>
Julian Reschke created TIKA-2570:
Summary: Tika 1.17 uses vulnerable Jackson version 2.9.2
Key: TIKA-2570
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2570
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17301714#comment-17301714
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-3320:
--
(side note: RFC 2616 is really really obsolete)
Yes, field
Julian Reschke created TIKA-3302:
Summary: CHANGES for 1.25 missing
Key: TIKA-3302
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3302
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17405664#comment-17405664
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-3539:
--
Thanks. Should have checked the existing tickets first.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17403759#comment-17403759
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-3535:
--
No problem; the old version had a similar issue so this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-3535:
-
Summary: tika-parser should not have a dependency on an slf4j
implementation (was: tika-parser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17403833#comment-17403833
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-3535:
--
I upgraded to 2.1.0, removing all exclusions, and everything
Julian Reschke created TIKA-3535:
Summary: tika-parser should not have a dependency on a slf4j
implementation
Key: TIKA-3535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3535
Project: Tika
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated TIKA-3539:
-
Summary: jdom 2.0.6 dependency in tika-parser-news-module has unfixed CVE
(was: jdom 2.0.6
Julian Reschke created TIKA-3539:
Summary: jdom 2.0.6 dependency in tika-parser-news-module
Key: TIKA-3539
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3539
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17834284#comment-17834284
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-4236:
--
Yep, that's what I meant :-).
> tika-parser-nlp-module has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17834280#comment-17834280
]
Julian Reschke commented on TIKA-4236:
--
AFAIU, 1.x might get updates when security relevant, no?
24 matches
Mail list logo