Woohoo! Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 1:27 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.14?
If there aren’t any objections I’ll roll 1.14 this weekend with an RC1 by
Monday
.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:34 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tika 1.14?
All,
I finished running the regression tests. I have just started going
through the results.
Reports are available here:
https://github.com/t
apache.org
Subject: RE: Tika 1.14?
All,
I finished running the regression tests. I have just started going through
the results.
Reports are available here:
https://github.com/tballison/share/blob/master/tika_comparisons/reports_1_14-trunk_vs_1_13.zip
-Original Message-
From: Chri
...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:25 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.14?
Sounds great to me Tim. If you tell me when the tests are done, I’d be happy to
RC a release!
On 9/21/16, 11:31 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
All,
Thank you, Chris!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:25 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.14?
Sounds great to me Tim. If you tell me when the tests are done, I’d be happy to
RC a release!
On 9/21
Sounds great to me Tim. If you tell me when the tests are done, I’d be happy to
RC a release!
On 9/21/16, 11:31 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote:
All,
PDFBox 2.0.3 is now integrated, I'm about to push the integration with
POI-3.15. I have a few cleanup things
Subject: Re: Tika 1.14?
Good thread Tim,
Regarding open issues and low hanging fruit to make it into 1.14, I will also
work on finishing https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/112.
I think Bob has an excellent point. The 2.X work is major and would be a big
step in the right direction. Having both
Good thread Tim,
Regarding open issues and low hanging fruit to make it into 1.14, I will
also work on finishing
https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/112.
I think Bob has an excellent point. The 2.X work is major and would be a
big step in the right direction. Having both branches longer and longer
1508, and 1680 are pending me/my review. I’ll get it done today.
On 8/12/16, 4:24 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote:
>> I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had
discussed holding off while some API changes that were under consideration.
Has any
I think waiting for pdfbox 2.0.3 would be great. There are some regressions
fixed.
Regards,
Luis
Em 12 de ago de 2016 08:24, "Allison, Timothy B."
escreveu:
> >> I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had
> discussed holding off while some API changes
>> I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had discussed
>> holding off while some API changes that were under consideration. Has any
>> progress been made on this?
> I think we're still trying to come up with a plan for how to allow multiple
> parsers to report text for
I believe we've also still got the issue of structured metadata outstanding.
Regards,
Ray
> On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:27 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Bob Paulin wrote:
>> I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had discussed
>> holding
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Bob Paulin wrote:
I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had
discussed holding off while some API changes that were under
consideration. Has any progress been made on this?
I think we're still trying to come up with a plan for how to allow
multiple
I know it's been a little bit since we talked about 2.0. We had
discussed holding off while some API changes that were under
consideration. Has any progress been made on this? The community has
been really good about dual maintaining but how much longer do we want
to have this expectation?
Sounds good to me
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect, Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena,
15 matches
Mail list logo