Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

che Nachricht- >> Von: Jorge Bay Gondra >> Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juli 2018 13:49 >> An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages >> >> Thanks Stephen! >> >> I've published 3.4.0-rc1 on nuget.org: >> https://www.nu

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

t: Montag, 2. Juli 2018 13:49 > An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages > > Thanks Stephen! > > I've published 3.4.0-rc1 on nuget.org: > https://www.nuget.org/packages/Gremlin.Net/3.4.0-rc1 > > It's ok to maintain RC for historical re

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

Thanks Stephen! I've published 3.4.0-rc1 on nuget.org: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Gremlin.Net/3.4.0-rc1 It's ok to maintain RC for historical reasons :) El lun., 2 jul. 2018 a las 13:10, Stephen Mallette () escribió: > Since you have access to the node repo, I see no reason not to give you

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

Since you have access to the node repo, I see no reason not to give you access to the nuget one as well - invitation sent. > For next time, shouldn't we use "alpha/beta" instead of "rc"? rc denotes code completion, no further API changes. I think we've taken a fairly loose meaning of "release

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

I've published 3.4.0-rc1 on npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/gremlin?activeTab=versions I don't have access to publish Gremlin.Net on nuget.org, can anyone grant me access? El lun., 2 jul. 2018 a las 11:45, Jorge Bay Gondra (< jorgebaygon...@gmail.com>) escribió: > About npm, within the

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

About npm, within the "latest" distribution tag , it sorts by date on their web UI but the dependencies are resolved correctly according to semver and tilde/caret notations, so there isn't much to worry about except that the latest shown on the website is not

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

For those interested in doing some development/testing against Python 3.4.0rc1 is out there on pypi: https://pypi.org/project/gremlinpython/3.4.0rc1/ Jorge, I'll leave the .NET and JS to you. Just to be clear, there is no need to commit anything back to git in terms of this release candidate.

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

yeah - we could have done that earlier in the week. i just tagged the current master at 3.4.0-rc1 https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/tree/3.4.0-rc1 so you can check that tag out and go from there. I can do python later in the day. By the way, I have a question about npm:

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

It looks like there isn't any concerns, can we move forward by releasing them? I can publish Node.js package and .NET package, if needed. I'm not confident enough to do it for pypi, tho :) El sáb., 23 jun. 2018 a las 12:21, Stephen Mallette () escribió: > I don't have a problem with doing that.

Re: [Discuss] 3.4.0 GLV packages

I don't have a problem with doing that. Indeed we have JVM snapshots deployed for 3.4.0 on Apache Snapshots Repo, so it makes sense to have dev artifacts deployed for the testing purposes for GLVs. Let's wait the standard 72 hours for any concerns and then get some release candidates released. On