Author: mturk
Date: Wed Nov 15 00:02:21 2006
New Revision: 475149
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475149
Log:
Document shm_size property.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/iis.xml
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/iis.xml
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Nov 15 00:05:43 2006
New Revision: 475152
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475152
Log:
Fix xml tags.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/iis.xml
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/iis.xml
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Nov 15 00:06:37 2006
New Revision: 475153
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475153
Log:
rewrite_rule_file is not required.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/iis.xml
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/config/iis.xml
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Nov 15 00:13:59 2006
New Revision: 475156
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475156
Log:
Document latest changes.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/changelog.xml
URL:
Mark Thomas wrote:
This move will allow the permissions in catalina.policy to be set to
allow reflection on this package. The impact on spec compliant web
applications should be zero. Web applications that depend on Tomcat
internals may have issues.
My intention would be to make this change in
Mark Thomas wrote:
Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
On second thought, I'm not sure it's a good idea to do it without some
verifications. For example, if reflection is allowed on the facades,
then it will probably allow getting the reference to the real object,
which should not be allowed.
Hi,
Instead of voting on 6.0.1, it would be possible to create a new tag for
6.0.2 incorporating the fixes for the most visible glitches, and vote on
that immediately (as there are no other changes at the moment).
Comments ?
Rémy
Tags are cheap !
+1
2006/11/15, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Instead of voting on 6.0.1, it would be possible to create a new tag for
6.0.2 incorporating the fixes for the most visible glitches, and vote on
that immediately (as there are no other changes at the moment).
Comments ?
While we're discuss about change in TC 5.5, what about using the TC 6
JMX modeler in TC 5.5 ?
the JMX modeler used in Tomcat (4.1/5/5.5) use too many memory when
the Tomcat is hosting many webapps each of with many Servlets/JSPs.
We switch from TC 3.3 to 5.5 and see a memory consumption
Henri Gomez wrote:
Tags are cheap !
+1
Yes, I think integrating the polish in a beta would be a good idea.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Author: remm
Date: Wed Nov 15 04:58:15 2006
New Revision: 475221
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475221
Log:
- Update version numbers.
- Update Eclipse to 3.2.1.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Instead of voting on 6.0.1, it would be possible to create a new tag for
6.0.2 incorporating the fixes for the most visible glitches, and vote on
that immediately (as there are no other changes at the moment).
Comments ?
Ok, so following the early reactions, I'll
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33961.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: funkman
Date: Wed Nov 15 05:37:51 2006
New Revision: 475232
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475232
Log:
tomcat - s/5.5/6/
servlet spec s/2.3/2.4/
jsp verion s/2.0/2.1/
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/index.xml
Modified:
+1, with the request that we send out an email to our mailing lists
telling them we've decided 6.0.1 is alpha quality and will remain as
such.
Yoav
On 11/15/06, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Cheers
Peter
Am 15.11.2006 um 11:31 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
Hi,
Instead of voting on
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
On second thought, I'm not sure it's a good idea to do it without some
verifications. For example, if reflection is allowed on the facades,
then it will probably
Hi,
On 11/15/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because these are internal implementations, if the user is whack
enough to try and access the real object behind the facade, I'd say
they're at their own risk.
I disagree: if the security manager is there, then there should be no
way
sounds good! +1
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Instead of voting on 6.0.1, it would be possible to create a new tag
for 6.0.2 incorporating the fixes for the most visible glitches, and
vote on that immediately (as there are no other changes at the moment).
Comments ?
Rémy
Author: remm
Date: Wed Nov 15 07:53:27 2006
New Revision: 475270
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475270
Log:
- Sync the installer's config files.
- Cosmetic fixes.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalAprInputBuffer.java
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I disagree: if the security manager is there, then there should be no
way to get the internal object.
Yes. Maybe the framework is broken for not trying to reflect on the
available interfaces for the subject instance. Maybe by default it
should only fail terminally if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40877.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I added a comment concerning a little experiment I did to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-66
Regards,
Rainer
Darryl Miles schrieb:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I disagree: if the security manager is there, then there should be no
way to get the internal object.
Yes. Maybe the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40770.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 11/15/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On 11/15/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because these are internal implementations, if the user is whack
enough to try and access the real object behind the facade, I'd say
they're at their own risk.
I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40877.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Wed Nov 15 15:20:19 2006
New Revision: 475488
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475488
Log:
- Changelog update.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
Author: remm
Date: Wed Nov 15 15:21:17 2006
New Revision: 475489
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475489
Log:
made a copy
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_2/
- copied from r475488, tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40877.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Rainer Jung wrote:
I added a comment concerning a little experiment I did to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-66
Regards,
Rainer
Thanks for this. I was planning to do this tonight but you saved me
the effort. On this basis, I am going to close the Tomcat bug as
invalid -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40770.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Wed Nov 15 17:49:46 2006
New Revision: 475521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475521
Log:
- Update the links.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-60.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-60.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-60.html
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Nov 15 23:10:31 2006
New Revision: 475601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475601
Log:
Use difftime instead a simple math on time_t for
map_update function. Be more informative with
logging.
Modified:
37 matches
Mail list logo
