Hi,
During an investigation of an issue I found that
org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspRuntimeContext (rows 513, 517)
and
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner (row 309)
still use jndi schema.
Shouldn't it be war schema instead of jndi?
Thanks,
Violeta
On 02/12/2014 08:22, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi,
During an investigation of an issue I found that
org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspRuntimeContext (rows 513, 517)
and
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner (row 309)
still use jndi schema.
Shouldn't it be war schema instead of
On 01/12/2014 21:52, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2014-12-01 22:00 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
This is an improvement since it is not just the scheme, host and port
but it still reflects the connection being made to WebSocket rather than
the Origin of the request. I don't see how the
2014-12-02 9:46 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Assuming that this is coming from testing with the TCK, I'd like to see
the results of challenging the affected tests (ideally with the
discussion on the EG as a result of that challenge) before making any
final decision on what the
On 01/12/2014 12:34, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2014-12-01 11:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 28/11/2014 20:33, r...@apache.org wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Fri Nov 28 20:33:20 2014
New Revision: 1642360
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1642360
Log:
- Use the extensions specified by
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Trokhov otro...@minsk.ximxim.com ---
Created attachment 32249
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32249action=edit
sorting list
I refactor import, so checkstyle task passed. So we leave my
On 02/12/2014 09:01, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2014-12-02 9:46 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Assuming that this is coming from testing with the TCK, I'd like to see
the results of challenging the affected tests (ideally with the
discussion on the EG as a result of that challenge)
2014-12-02 10:12 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:My opinion is
that the default value currently being provided is just
plain wrong. The origin is meant to be the script origin generating the
WebSocket connection request not the scheme, host and port of the
WebSocket connection currently
2014-12-02 10:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Possible options:
a) Require servers to support a NO-OP extension. Kind of pointless since
it would just be there to pass the tests.
b) Drop the test. Not ideal. If the API is there it should be tested.
c) Add a ignore unknown
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57215
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #5)
5. In CoyoteAdapter.postParseRequest() when decodedURI.getType() is not
bytes (e.g. when requestURI is changed by
2014-12-02 10:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 02/12/2014 08:22, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi,
During an investigation of an issue I found that
org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspRuntimeContext (rows 513, 517)
and
org.apache.tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanner (row 309)
2014-12-02 12:12 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 02/12/2014 09:01, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2014-12-02 9:46 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Assuming that this is coming from testing with the TCK, I'd like to see
the results of challenging the affected tests (ideally with the
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 11:56:59 2014
New Revision: 1642845
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1642845
Log:
Remove origin header due to bad feedback.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/WsWebSocketContainer.java
Modified:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56966
--- Comment #4 from Tom Fitzhenry t...@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk ---
The machine is a virtual machine running on the Windows Azure hypervisor
(similar to Hyper-V, supposedly).
The guest OS runs Windows Server 2012 R2, and reports its hardware
On 02/12/2014 09:24, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2014-12-02 10:12 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:My opinion is
that the default value currently being provided is just
plain wrong. The origin is meant to be the script origin generating the
WebSocket connection request not the scheme, host
2014-12-02 15:47 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
I think there might a solution that works for everybody (thanks
Konstantin). What about setting an origin header value of null in the
client if none is set by the user? That is consistent with all the
specifications and is arguably
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57252
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54143
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 32252
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32252action=edit
2014-12-02_tc6_54143_v1.patch
Patch for Tomcat 6
Add display of memory
Author: kkolinko
Date: Tue Dec 2 15:18:32 2014
New Revision: 1642898
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1642898
Log:
proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 17:35:04 2014
New Revision: 1642962
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1642962
Log:
Add failing websockets test.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/TestEncodingDecoding.java
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 18:09:44 2014
New Revision: 1642974
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1642974
Log:
Add another websockets failing test on batch mode.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/TestEncodingDecoding.java
Modified:
Guys,
For a myriad of personal, professional, and health reasons, I've been out of
pocket for many months. I'm finally starting to catch up today on 9200 Tomcat
developer and user list messages. It will take me many days. I just wanted to
let y'all know that I'm still alive, and head off any
On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2014-06-18 23:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently
BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the
servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO.
Author: markt
Date: Tue Dec 2 20:16:01 2014
New Revision: 1643002
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1643002
Log:
Fix concurrency issue identified while investigating BZ 57252. Ensure that
non-container threads can't change the async state until the container thread
has completed post-processing.
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 21:15:44 2014
New Revision: 1643007
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1643007
Log:
As an additional cleanup, don't write any empty message when flushing and
there's no data to flush.
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 21:16:51 2014
New Revision: 1643008
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1643008
Log:
Websockets annotations can be located on superclasses, and also improve
duplicates detection.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/Util.java
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274
--- Comment #3 from Nick Williams nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net ---
I will think about this some. Off the top of my head, I don't know what the
answer is, but it sure would be nice if there were a solution.
--
You are receiving this mail
Huh. Amazing how fast that went. I'm caught up on everything since May 7 (last
time I checked my email in this folder). Good job, everyone involved, on
releasing 8.0.x stable, beginning 9.0.x, and addressing many bugs. Kudos!
Nick
On Dec 2, 2014, at 1:20 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
Guys,
For
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274
--- Comment #4 from Phillip pverhey...@broadleafcommerce.com ---
The solution that I had was to completely disable the scanning by adding an
empty absolute-ordering / tag into my web.xml. This obviously means that
there is no way to have
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
(In reply to Phillip from comment #4)
Mark, what do you mean by delay the transformation until the the class is
declared? Does this mean moving the transformation code from
On 02/12/2014 21:16, r...@apache.org wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 21:16:51 2014
New Revision: 1643008
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1643008
Log:
Websockets annotations can be located on superclasses, and also improve
duplicates detection.
No they can't. See section 4.8 of the Java
Mark,
On 6/18/14 5:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently
BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the
servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO.
I would like to propose dropping support for Comet in Tomcat 9
On 02/12/2014 22:17, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 6/18/14 5:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently
BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the
servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO.
I would like
2014-12-02 23:12 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 02/12/2014 21:16, r...@apache.org wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 2 21:16:51 2014
New Revision: 1643008
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1643008
Log:
Websockets annotations can be located on superclasses, and also improve
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55837
--- Comment #10 from Jo Desmet jo_des...@yahoo.com ---
Just tested this in 8.0.3
log.info(Path3: +request.getRealPath(/)); // Works
log.info(Path4: +request.getRealPath(\\)); // returns null!!
log.info(Path2:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its community integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-validate has an issue affecting its community
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57238
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
0. Author tags have been discouraged, while the older contributors names
have been left in for ... nostalgia?
One should
38 matches
Mail list logo
