+1
Would be great if we could get a 7.0.48.
Thanks
Jean-Louis
2013/12/1 Bob DeRemer bob.dere...@thingworx.com
Is a vote on 7.0.48 expected anytime in the near future?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Jean-Louis
Hi,
AFAIK, Tomcat 7.0.51 won't get published.
The 7.0.52 hit Apache repo and the download page should be updated soon I
guess.
JLouis
2014-02-19 10:57 GMT+01:00 Tushar Agrawal tushar_agra...@symantec.com:
Hello,
We are using Tomcat in one of the Symantec product. I would like to know
by
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Hi,
AFAIK, Tomcat 7.0.51 won't get published.
The 7.0.52 hit Apache repo and the download page should be updated soon I
guess.
Tomcat 7.0.52 is available on the download page.
Enjoy.
Regards
Violeta
JLouis
2014-02-19 10:57 GMT+01
Awesome!
JLouis
2014-02-19 13:55 GMT+01:00 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com:
2014-02-19 14:53 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
Do you plan to also update the
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html page
And of course the home page http
It should return at least always a non null principal AFAIR, isn't it?
2014-08-04 19:33 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
I've recently found out that getUserPrincipal() returns null in a Listener
[1].
I remember that this used to return the correct Principal in older
: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-04 22:04 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com:
It should return at least always a non null principal AFAIR, isn't it?
2014-08-04 19:33
Hello guys,
I'm currently facing an issue with the BaseAuthenticator.
Before opening a issue on the bug tracker, I'd like to get your opinion
guys.
The use case is simple: use an HTTPS tomcat connector with mutual
authentication (CLIENT-CERT).
It does not involve at all any front serveur like
2014-08-06 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 06/08/2014 14:54, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hello guys,
I'm currently facing an issue with the BaseAuthenticator.
Before opening a issue on the bug tracker, I'd like to get your opinion
guys.
The members of this list
Hi,
works out of the box in TomEE.
JLouis
Le Tue Nov 25 2014 at 11:55:42, shailendra singh shailendra...@outlook.com
a écrit :
After posting my question to Tomcat users mailing list I realized that I
should have posted my question to this mailing list. Hence this email.
Some of the
Thanks Mark for the update.
Some specs are final already.
Some are still being worked on, like WebSocket which is a bit late at
the moment.
If you are willing to help on this one, feel free to jump in.
Le sam. 3 oct. 2020 à 20:39, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I mentioned TCK status
in the BasicAuthenticator valve.
Hope it's more or less clear ;-)
Some thoughts would be very helpfup
Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 18:21, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 17/07/2020 16:56, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following up on this thread.
> > Pretty old I know. Haven't seen m
. 6 juil. 2020 à 14:50, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 06/07/2020 12:43, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if there are any plans to get GenericPrincipal to
> > inherit CallerPrincipal?
> > From a backward compatibility perspective, it
Hi,
I would like to know if there are any plans to get GenericPrincipal to
inherit CallerPrincipal?
>From a backward compatibility perspective, it does not seem to hurt because
the getName() is already in the GenericPrincipal.
The question comes because I was reading the Java Security API and
Hi,
Following up on this thread.
Pretty old I know. Haven't seen more recent topics on JASPIC and Jakarta EE
TCK.
I tried to invest some time in TomEE to run the JASPIC TCK which is fully
relying on Tomcat.
I have counted 68 tests under the package com.sun.ts.tests.jaspic
The wiki says 100+ so
Hi,
I have been using Tomcat Taglib (shaded with Xalan and Serializer).
Works quite well on TomEE but I have one failure I'd like to discuss with
you before possibly opening a challenge.
https://tck.work/tomee/tests?path=com.sun.ts.tests.jstl=1608116575927=FAILED
I have fixed 4 or the 5,
but
ther than add the newly
> created GenericPrincipal to the Subject's private credentials, see if
> the new GenericPrincipal has the same name as an existing
> GenericPrincipal and if it does merge them.
>
> I'm not sure that would be safe to do in the general case though.
>
> Ma
Hello community,
I'm working on the TCK in the TomEE project which leverages Tomcat.
I was running the TCK and I realized JSTL/JSP/Servlet/WebSockets aren't
100% green.
I'm questioning my setup. That's why I wanted to ask if you guys spent time
running the TCK against Tomcat. And if yes, is
lication-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 17 nov. 2020 à 10:16, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a
> écrit :
>
> > Hello community,
> >
> > I'm working on the TCK in the TomEE project which leverages Tomcat.
> > I was running the TCK and I rea
ch...@christopherschultz.net> a écrit :
> Jean-Louis,
>
> On 5/5/21 09:49, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > Now that we crossed the finish line with TomEE compatibility, I'd like
> > to give back the BOM changes according to this discussion.
> >
> > I did t
JAAS, JASPIC and Jakarta Security are all different.
Tomcat does not implement Jakarta Security so removing JAAS creates a gap
in my opinion.
I'd second Romain, JASPIC requires a SAM to be implemented by the
application.
Long story short, I'd probably deprecate for 10.x and target a removal for
Le lun. 26 avr. 2021 à 20:48, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 26/04/2021 18:49, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > JAAS, JASPIC and Jakarta Security are all different.
>
> My mistake. I knew JASPIC had a slightly bigger rename than most specs
> and incorrectly thought it becam
Hi,
Still working on getting TomEE certified for Jakarta EE 9.1
We are using latest Tomcat 10.x and we indeed see now only one failure as
described here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Servlet+TCK+5.0
I understand this is not really a critical thing to be certified for
ay 2, 2021 at 3:17 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Still working on getting TomEE certified for Jakarta EE 9.1
> > >> We are using latest Tomcat 10.x and we indeed see now only one failure
>
Hi,
Now that we crossed the finish line with TomEE compatibility, I'd like to
give back the BOM changes according to this discussion.
I did the updated and created another subclass for
DefaultServletEncodingBaseTest
[image: image.png]
Did some fixes around that test to take the changes into
That's awesome news.
I'm glad it's something that can be achieved without too much effort.
I understand and buy the pragmatic approach.
But at the same time, if we can do a step forward and get even closer to
being certified, that'd be great.
Le jeu. 1 avr. 2021 à 10:06, Mark Thomas a écrit :
CK.
>
> At this point from a Jakarta Tags perspective, I believe the golden file
> is correct.
>
Le mer. 14 avr. 2021 à 10:16, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a
écrit :
> Thanks for the answer.
>
> Do you mind adding the comment in the issue?
> I can copy/paste if not. It's just
in the fix.
Thanks
Le jeu. 15 avr. 2021 à 10:57, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 15/04/2021 09:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > I've got an answer from JSTL team.
> > Here it is
>
>
>
> >> 1. Jakarta Tags Specification Section 7.4 details the
> tag:
Hi,
I've got some TCK failures
com.sun.ts.tests.websocket.ee.jakarta.websocket.session.WSClient#getRequestURITest
com.sun.ts.tests.websocket.ee.jakarta.websocket.session.WSClient#setTimeout1Test
com.sun.ts.tests.websocket.spec.servercontainer.addendpoint.WSClient#getRequestURITest
Hi guys,
I have one JSTL issue and I'd need your feedback on it.
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jstl-api/issues/140
Can you guys have a look and let me know what you think?
--
Jean-Louis
Hi,
I am running WebSocket TCK on TomEE and I'm having some issues.
Wondering if I missed some configuration.
Essentially the TCK is deploying an application with this class
ork/tomee/api/build/file/1617771682192/1400>
But I'll investigate first and reach out if needed.
Le jeu. 8 avr. 2021 à 15:35, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 08/04/2021 14:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running WebSocket TCK on TomEE and I'm having some
That is in line with the "negdep" sub package Mark mentioned.
I will need to work to exclude the deployment failures in this situation.
Thanks a lot for the information
Le jeu. 8 avr. 2021 à 15:43, Konstantin Kolinko a
écrit :
> чт, 8 апр. 2021 г. в 16:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Le jeu. 23 juil. 2020 à 16:18, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>
>> Comments in line.
>>
>> On 22/07/2020 10:19, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Small update on the progress.
>> > Passed: 52 and Failed: 9
>> >
>> > I h
Thanks for the answer.
Do you mind adding the comment in the issue?
I can copy/paste if not. It's just to give context to others
Thanks
Le mar. 13 avr. 2021 à 21:44, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 13/04/2021 20:17, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I have one JS
It makes sense.
+1
Le ven. 6 janv. 2023 à 11:50, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> Tomcat (all versions) currently ships a JNDI factory for JAX-RPC 1.1.
> This factory was added in Tomcat 6 (Java EE 5).
>
> Java EE 5 (Tomcat 6) encouraged new applications to use JAX-WS rather
> than JAX-RPC.
>
> Java EE
I agree.
It's a good test and it has very well done the job.
+1 with the approach. Seems reasonable
Le sam. 12 nov. 2022, 12:23, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 11/11/2022 14:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 3:24 PM Rainer Jung
> wrote:
> >>
> >> FYI: the performance check
36 matches
Mail list logo
