https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Error handling changes were back-ported to 8.5.x meaning this fix needed to be
back-ported as well.
Fixed in 8.5.x for 8.5.44 onwards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p.glizniew...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #4 from clem...@guillaume.bzh ---
I confirmed the bug is fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #3 from clem...@guillaume.bzh ---
>3 is something that we can address. I have committed an enhancement for this
>to 9.0.x.
This is awesome. I'll test it when the next version is released.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
I don't see what the refactoring could have changed here at this point. The
problem is the response is committed (really, as you wrote data) and so that's
why there's an include (which fails as you saw). T
