On 13/11/17 12:26, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2017-11-13 13:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 13/11/17 09:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hmm.
>>>
>>> As I started to look at this I realised that a large number of the
>>> classes with errors are only using the static import
2017-11-13 13:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 13/11/17 09:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hmm.
>>
>> As I started to look at this I realised that a large number of the
>> classes with errors are only using the static import a few times. Some
>> of them are using a mix of static
On 13/11/17 09:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> As I started to look at this I realised that a large number of the
> classes with errors are only using the static import a few times. Some
> of them are using a mix of static and non-static imports.
>
> Given that switching to the non-static
On 13/11/17 08:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 11/11/17 21:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2017-11-11 23:48 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 27/10/17 14:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
Now Checkstyle 8.3 has been released, I think we need to do something
about these. There are quite
On 11/11/17 21:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2017-11-11 23:48 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 27/10/17 14:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Now Checkstyle 8.3 has been released, I think we need to do something
>>> about these. There are quite a few options.
>>>
>>> Do we want the
2017-11-11 23:48 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 27/10/17 14:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Now Checkstyle 8.3 has been released, I think we need to do something
>> about these. There are quite a few options.
>>
>> Do we want the minimalist approach (run Rainer's script, tweak the
>>
On 27/10/17 14:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Now Checkstyle 8.3 has been released, I think we need to do something
> about these. There are quite a few options.
>
> Do we want the minimalist approach (run Rainer's script, tweak the
> Eclipse recommendations to get as close as we can to what Checkstyle
Now Checkstyle 8.3 has been released, I think we need to do something
about these. There are quite a few options.
Do we want the minimalist approach (run Rainer's script, tweak the
Eclipse recommendations to get as close as we can to what Checkstyle
wants) or do we take a broader 'What was Mark
Am 25.09.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 24/09/17 12:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2017-09-24 12:45 GMT+03:00 Rainer Jung :
The current Gump failures during validate might be due to the following
change in checkstyle:
On 24/09/17 12:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2017-09-24 12:45 GMT+03:00 Rainer Jung :
>> The current Gump failures during validate might be due to the following
>> change in checkstyle:
>>
>> https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/5065
>>
>> Gump uses a snapshot
2017-09-24 12:45 GMT+03:00 Rainer Jung :
> The current Gump failures during validate might be due to the following
> change in checkstyle:
>
> https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/5065
>
> Gump uses a snapshot of checkstyle.
>
> The complains should be mostly
The current Gump failures during validate might be due to the following
change in checkstyle:
https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/5065
Gump uses a snapshot of checkstyle.
The complains should be mostly about additional separator lines e.g.
between static and non-static imports
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
> validate:
> [mkdir] Created dir: /srv/gump/public/workspace/
> tomcat-trunk/output/res/checkstyle
> [checkstyle] Running Checkstyle 8.2-SNAPSHOT on 3152 files
> [checkstyle] Running Checkstyle 8.2-SNAPSHOT on 245
13 matches
Mail list logo