Re: MP.next()

2018-04-20 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Hi all, I have reworked the PR and started creating an example based on the movie one. The wiring is done, I need to create a login page so I can generate a token and then pass the token on REST calls. If anyone wants to help (my JS skills aren't very good). The PR is against TomEE 8.x branch.

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-20 Thread Mark Struberg
The minor bump to 7.1 is mainly for java8 not for mp. And of course that might affect users rather heavily. There are still companies which are on Java7 – they should be aware. Lg, Strub > Am 19.04.2018 um 21:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Le 19 avr. 2018 20:47,

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 19 avr. 2018 20:47, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : Heh that was nicely put and I do certainly agree with your finding ;) @Romain, the 7.1 was just 7.0.x + java8 bump and MP. I got that but not its need. Of course I have no clue who will use EE7 with MP, if he can

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-19 Thread Mark Struberg
Heh that was nicely put and I do certainly agree with your finding ;) @Romain, the 7.1 was just 7.0.x + java8 bump and MP. Of course I have no clue who will use EE7 with MP, if he can have EE8 as well... All I wanted is to make a clear disctinction between TomEE with Java7 and TomEE which

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, I don't get the rational of having a 7.x with that. Any reason? Technically TomEE 8 is way more ready to release than TomEE 7.1 ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog |

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-19 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Right now we have JL's change in master as well as TomEE 8. I'm happy to try and find time to release both. However, I think we're inching very close with TomEE 7.0.5, so does anyone mind if I create the 7.1 branch, and shift JL's JWT work there, and take it out of master (7.0.5)? Jon On Thu,

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-19 Thread Mark Struberg
Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is cool. And I fully support that. But right now let's please focus on shipping TomEE-7.0.5 first. Most probably 7.1 could be done almost in parallel. But we do not have endless resources. At least I don't. LieGrue, strub > Am

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-18 Thread David Blevins
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 4:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > There was a discussion about this a few weeks ago where we agreed to ship > TomEE-7.0.5 and only then switch to a branch. > > That's the reason why we backported tons of stuff in Johnzon, OWB and > OpenJPA. >

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-18 Thread Mark Struberg
There was a discussion about this a few weeks ago where we agreed to ship TomEE-7.0.5 and only then switch to a branch. That's the reason why we backported tons of stuff in Johnzon, OWB and OpenJPA. Just waiting for feedback whether it now works fine or if there is still something broken. So

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
What is blocking to release tomee 8? Nothing ;) Id keep it simple and avoid another maintenance branch. Le 17 avr. 2018 23:49, "Jonathan Gallimore" a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 22:32 David Blevins, wrote: > > > > On Apr 17, 2018, at

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 22:32 David Blevins, wrote: > > On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > Do we have a branch for it? > > Master is 7.x for Java 7 > > Not sure how we want to run that. One option is we could just

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread David Blevins
> On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro > wrote: > > Do we have a branch for it? > Master is 7.x for Java 7 Not sure how we want to run that. One option is we could just switch wherever 7x lives now to 7.1. If we really wanted to patch 7.0.x we could

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread David Blevins
> On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:25 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > Can we also create a TomEE 7.1? I think everyone who +1ed was thinking about > something we could release sooner than TomEE 8.x. Never mind, I see you have two PRs, one for 8.0 and one for a 7.1. Never mind!

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Do we have a branch for it? Master is 7.x for Java 7 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:25 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Can we also create a TomEE 7.1? I think everyone who +1ed was thinking >

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread David Blevins
Can we also create a TomEE 7.1? I think everyone who +1ed was thinking about something we could release sooner than TomEE 8.x. -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Apr 17, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro > wrote: > >

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Thanks guys. Yes I meant TomEE 8.x I have rework the MP-JWT contribution so the extension leaves into a different module than the TCK. The TCK is green for the MP-JWT. New PR is here https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/130 If you are ok, I will revert from current master the MP-JWT which

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread David Blevins
+1 -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Apr 16, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro > wrote: > > Hi community, > > Most microprofile requires Java 8. > Is everyone ok if we have microprofile implemented on TomEE 7.1 (Java

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Richard Monson-Haefel
+1 On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:11 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hi community, > > Most microprofile requires Java 8. > Is everyone ok if we have microprofile implemented on TomEE 7.1 (Java 8)? > > Thanks > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro >

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Rudy De Busscher
+1 (Non binding) Rudy On 17 April 2018 at 13:12, Roberto Cortez wrote: > > +1On Tuesday, April 17, 2018, 12:11:58 AM GMT+1, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > Hi community, > > Most microprofile requires Java 8. > Is everyone ok if we

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
+1 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hi community, > > Most microprofile requires Java 8. > Is everyone ok if we have microprofile implemented on TomEE 7.1 (Java 8)? > > Thanks > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro >

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-17 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
+1 Andy Gumbrecht On 04/17/2018 01:11 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: Hi community, Most microprofile requires Java 8. Is everyone ok if we have microprofile implemented on TomEE 7.1 (Java 8)? Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: MP.next()

2018-04-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Isnt it fb_tomee8 branch so tomee 8? Otherwise +1 Le 17 avr. 2018 01:11, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" a écrit : > Hi community, > > Most microprofile requires Java 8. > Is everyone ok if we have microprofile implemented on TomEE 7.1 (Java 8)? > > Thanks > > > -- > Jean-Louis