Hi,
Different delivery services can be configured with different domain names now.
In some cases, different delivery services with same domain name and different
path prefixes are needed. These delivery services can have different
configurations.
The problem and a solution are described in the
liveryservice table entry, since all those type if things are set
there?
Can you elaborate on the use case you are trying to solve?
Rgds,
JvD
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 04:16, Jifeng Yang (jifyang)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Different delivery s
nk_ this would work without changing Traffic Router (it just tags on
the path in the redirect)... 3.3 in the doc says Traffic Router will be changed
as well, but I don't see that in the PR?
Also, going back to my initial question - did you consider implementing
this with PATH_REGEXP
gt;<http://origin.server.com
<http://origin.server.com/>>, so there is no way to differentiate the two
delivery services into being stored on disk vs in RAM.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 6:47 AM,
Hi,
The document is updated. And an example is added in the document.
Thanks,
Jifeng
On 06/12/2016, 19:41, "Jifeng Yang (jifyang)" wrote:
JvD: I did test the PATH_REGEX in Traffic Router. It works.
About the disk-vs-RAM question, I think both of you are right.
Hi,
We met a problem about traffic_ops_ort:
The ATS config file “remap.config” happened to be zero size. After that, the
“remap.config” file couldn't be updated by the traffic_ops_ort.
Checking the code in the file “/opt/ort/traffic_ops_ort.pl”, there is:
sub can_read_write_file {
ctionality. :)
So, yes, I think we could skip that check for files already on disk.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Jifeng Yang (jifyang)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We met a problem about traffic_ops_ort:
>
> The ATS config file “remap.config” happen
Hi,
I noticed that a CDN named “ALL” was added in Traffic Ops since Traffic Control
2.1.
I wonder the reason for adding the “ALL” CDN (what’s the purpose of adding it).
Would it cause any issue if I remove the “ALL” CDN in my deployment?
Thanks,
Jifeng
an in a multiple CDN environment.
> Hope that helps!
>
> Derek
>
> On 3/19/18, 7:07 AM, "Jifeng Yang (jifyang)" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that a CDN named “ALL” was added in Traffic Ops since
> Traffic Control 2.1.
Due to this change, the Traffic Ops APIs may also need change:
(GET/POST/PUT/DELETE) /api/1.2/servers/{:svrId}/2ndintfs
Need change
Suggestion: /api/1.2/servers/{:svrId}/interfaces
(GET/POST/PUT/DELETE) /api/1.2/servers/{:svrId}/2ndips
Don't need change.
Thanks,
Jifeng
On 04/04/2
10 matches
Mail list logo
