Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

On 01.03.2018, at 19:39, Marshall Schor wrote: > > Richard - did you find anything else that might affect the release decision, > in > your testing? If I had not run into the issue, I would have tested a bit more with WebAnno. But I had done that earlier with a SNAPSHOT version

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

Richard - did you find anything else that might affect the release decision, in your testing? -Marshall On 2/26/2018 9:32 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 26.02.2018, at 15:11, Marshall Schor wrote: >> After a bit more thought, I feel there are always going to be

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

Finally - checked signatures: OK - spot checked readme, release notes, license, etc.: OK - after converting many JCas classes recompiled a large set of projects using the maven artifacts: OK - ran a multi-annotator pipeline and compared with V2 results: OK - built from source & checked

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

need 1 more vote? -M On 2/5/2018 4:28 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > Hi, > > Here's rc4 of uimaj 3.0.0 sdk. > > The change since rc3: some fixes to the logging APIs to avoid "double > scanning" > of substitution when using logrb style calls, some formatting of the messages > fixes for logging,

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

On 26.02.2018, at 15:11, Marshall Schor wrote: > > After a bit more thought, I feel there are always going to be problems to fix > (hopefully, minor ones!), and I think it's high time to get this release > going. > > Richard, unless you think the lack of this error detection

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

After a bit more thought, I feel there are always going to be problems to fix (hopefully, minor ones!), and I think it's high time to get this release going. Richard, unless you think the lack of this error detection warrants respinning the RC, I'd rather queue up this fix (and many more I think

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

For me, it's OK to do another RC. Peter Am 21.02.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Marshall Schor: Hi Richard, Once again, thanks for your testing :-) Well,  it looks like I fixed the setters and getters for the various non-FS types, but forgot to include a fix for the feature structure value type.

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

Hi Richard, Once again, thanks for your testing :-) Well,  it looks like I fixed the setters and getters for the various non-FS types, but forgot to include a fix for the feature structure value type. This will need a new fix. I'm happy to do another RC, but if others think this is not worth

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

Compared SVN tag to source release: OK Build from source release with empty repo: OK Spot checked release notes: OK Spot checked issues list: OK Spot checked signature: OK Built uimaFIT 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT against the RC: OK Built DKPro Core 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT against the RC: OK - Actually I had a strange

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

built svn-tag - OK built source-release - OK spot checked license/notice/notes - OK spot checked signatures - OK built ruta-v3 with rc - OK test update site in Eclipse Oxygen 2 - OK built some component repositories with rc Code changes are required bc compile errors like ... FSArray concepts =

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

The outdated cover class was the problem.. I fixed it Am 16.02.2018 um 11:18 schrieb Peter Klügl: > Started with review. > > Some test in ruta-v3 are failing. I am investigating... could be that > they can be fixed on ruta-side. > > > Best, > > > Peter > > > Am 05.02.2018 um 22:28 schrieb

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

Started with review. Some test in ruta-v3 are failing. I am investigating... could be that they can be fixed on ruta-side. Best, Peter Am 05.02.2018 um 22:28 schrieb Marshall Schor: > Hi, > > Here's rc4 of uimaj 3.0.0 sdk. > > The change since rc3: some fixes to the logging APIs to avoid

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512   signatures OK compare source-release with tag - OK build from source - OK Install plugins into Eclipse Oxygen, run CDE, create type descriptor, run JCasGen, including limited: OK Ran doc analyzer from installed version of bin - OK. no change to

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-3.0.0 rc4

Well, I'm happy to report this was a "tester" error. I had neglected to save the Type System descriptor before running JCas Gen, so the limited option couldn't find its location to test. Once I saved it, it worked as expected. So, the testing is back on for RC4... Cheers- Marshall On