+1 Sounds great!
On 5/18/15 8:33 AM, Steven Jacobs wrote:
Great work!
Steven
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Efi efika...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is my update on what I have been doing this last week:
Created an XMLInputFormat java class with the functionalities that Hamza
Very cool!!
On 6/13/15 9:38 AM, Efi wrote:
Hello everyone,
The reading of a single document and a collection of documents from
HDFS is completed and tested.New JUnit tests are added in the xtest
project, they are just copies of the aggregate tests, that I changed a
bit to run for the
The first one seems pretty natural...
On 8/18/15 9:09 AM, Efi wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like your thoughts on something about the HDFS reads.So
far when you submitted a query, with the collection or document
function, the system would first check your local file system and if
the
This is great!!
On 7/24/15 10:32 AM, Shivani Mall wrote:
Another point worth noting, but not highlighted in the email, is that we
started with 2 working queries.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Eldon Carman ecarm...@ucr.edu wrote:
The Number represents the XMark query number. Query 18 uses
I think 'bravo' would be a good answer - we have such an option in
AsterixDB. (Not channeling the results back through a thin straw would
be a good idea - that way the system could be used to do large XML-based
ETL type things.) Both local files and HDFS make sense as the target FS
On
Looks good!
On 10/6/15 9:00 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi,
this is a draft for the board report for October.
Should we add/clarify/reword something?
Thanks,
Till
—
Description:
Apache VXQuery implements a parallel XML Query processor.
Activity:
- After Google Summer of Code ended activity
Ditto - +1!
On 3/9/16 3:28 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
+1!
On 9 Mar 2016, at 15:25, Eldon Carman wrote:
Our website has a project team page that includes contributor list.
Currently the list is empty. Should we add GSOC students from 2015 to the
website contributor list? I think it would make
+1
On 4/5/16 8:25 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi,
here’s a proposal for this month’s board report.
Comments/Questions?
Thanks,
Till
===
Description:
Apache VXQuery implements a parallel XML Query processor.
Activity:
- Increased interest and activity around Google Summer of Code.
-
Sounds like a great plan!
On 5/9/16 10:18 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
On 9 May 2016, at 12:02, Preston Carman wrote:
I think we have three options: optimize for space, keys (jdm:keys) or
field lookup (jdm:value). The optimization for keys and field lookup
could be done independently. Lets
+1 for HDFS (good reason to release!) and Steven
On 5/8/16 10:06 AM, Preston Carman wrote:
Hi Guys,
Its been about a year since our last release. What do you think we
need before doing another release?
- I think the only out standing issue is HDFS. It is so close to being
finished and
+1 to first get things working (and presumably modularizing the code so
that other/later streamlined implementations can be plugged in instead).
On 5/9/16 6:24 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
All of this looks pretty good!
Wrt. the question of the dictionary for the fields, I think that we
should
AsterixDB actually has three options:
- Execute query and return results, all synchronously.
- Execute query and return a HANDLE to the results, synchronously -
the handle can be used later to get the results.
- Execute the query asynchronously and return a HANDLE - the handle
can be
Erandi,
AsterixDB actually spools its results to local result partitions and
then delivers them out the top - it does this so that resources like
memory can't be held hostage by the system's clients. @Till, can you
add a few sentences about this?
Cheers,
MIke
On 7/10/17 9:48 PM, Erandi
+1 for both result formats now!
On 6/6/17 10:00 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
I think that the API still looks pretty good. A few considerations:
- We could think about an async API similar to the one in AsterixDB,
but I
don’t think that that should be a priority.
- A point that I might want
It seems like Vassilis might?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandon-gutzmann-997213b8/
On 10/12/18 2:21 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi,
we received a PR or Intersect and Union [1]. That’s great!
Do we know the author (and do we know if they have an ICLA on file)?
Cheers,
Till
[1]
+1 on proceeding with the move ASAP.
On 1/4/19 11:05 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi,
I think that the move to Gitbox will be beneficial for VXQuery as we
already accepted GitHub PRs in the past and this path will become easier
now.
Also, I don’t see a reason why we’d need to wait with the
+1
On 1/8/20 6:35 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi VXQuery Developers,
A discussion thread on moving Apache VXQuery to the Attic yielded only
2 replies [1] and there is no new activity on the project.
Please VOTE on the proposal to move Apache VXQuery to the attic:
[ ] +1 Move Apache VXQuery to
17 matches
Mail list logo
