Re: Stable behavior ids

2020-05-15 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi All, With Sven's comment in mind and the fact that Andrea did not directly understand the implications of the new method, I decided that the new method was indeed not a good idea. It complicates the API and brings too little benefit. I've updated the PR once more to clarify the impact and

Re: Stable behavior ids

2020-05-15 Thread Sven Meier
Hi Edmond, +1 from me. Thanks Sven On 15.05.20 09:01, Emond Papegaaij wrote: Hi All, With Sven's comment in mind and the fact that Andrea did not directly understand the implications of the new method, I decided that the new method was indeed not a good idea. It complicates the API and

Re: Stable behavior ids

2020-05-15 Thread Andrea Del Bene
+1 On 15/05/20 09:01, Emond Papegaaij wrote: Hi All, With Sven's comment in mind and the fact that Andrea did not directly understand the implications of the new method, I decided that the new method was indeed not a good idea. Don't worry about me, it appends to me quite often to not

[GitHub] [wicket] asfgit merged pull request #432: WICKET-6774: minor change to contract of Component.getBehaviorId

2020-05-15 Thread GitBox
asfgit merged pull request #432: URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/432 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the