harity, funded by individual
> donations and corporate sponsors including AMD, Basis Technology,
> Cloudera, Facebook, Google, IBM, HP, Hortonworks, Matt Mullenweg,
> Microsoft, PSW Group, SpringSource/VMware, and Yahoo!.
> For more information, visit https://www.apache.org/.
>
> "Apache", "Apache Wicket", and "ApacheCon" are trademarks of The
> Apache Software Foundation.
> All other brands and trademarks are the property of their respective
> owners.
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
t; >
> > > Once the official repo is migrated to wicketstuff, I can work on
> cleaning
> > > up our commits and propose PRs with the fixes/improvements we made in
> the
> > > last 2 years.
> > >
> > > I cced Hielke to have his opinion about this.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Guillaume
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
pository based
> > on Java 8 / Wicket 8?
> >
> > The ResourceReference based on Nashorn requires Java 8.
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
e/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/IGenericComponent.java
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ import org.apache.wicket.model.IModel;
> *
> * @param
> * the type of the model object
> + * @param
> + * the type of the component
> */
> public interface IGenericComponent T, ?>>
> {
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
aits :-( os, there not much
to be done in this case :-(
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Nice! Maybe something s
ject: Wicket
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: wicket
> >Affects Versions: 7.2.0
> >Reporter: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >Assignee: Sven Meier
> >Priority: Minor
> >
> > Because of wicket
L: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6124
> > Project: Wicket
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: wicket
> >Affects Versions: 7.2.0
> >Reporter: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >Assignee: Sven Meier
> >
t;
>- websphere portal 8.5
>- liferay 6.1 GA3
>- liferay 6.2 GA6
>
> Please look also at my pull request
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/pull/476
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
5d8d6ef1c86d93006f37/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/Component.java#L3066-L3070
>
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
her provide a
> model
> > >> before using #setDefaultModelObject() or use #setDefaultModel()
> instead.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 1.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/1cf2a93eb28560e412365d8d6ef1c86d93006f37/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/Component.java#L3066-L3070
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
] - Runtime Exception rendering ComponentTag with
> > >> RelativePathPrefixHandler
> > >>* [WICKET-6151] - DebugBar/PageSizeDebugPanel throws
> > >> NullPointerException (need wrapper exception with more detail)
> > >>
> > >> ** Improvement
> > >>
> > >>* [WICKET-6053] - Allow to reuse the same application instance in
> > >> several tests
> > >>* [WICKET-6081] - Add "assertNotRequired" to the WicketTester
> > >>* [WICKET-6098] - Add logging to HttpSessionDataStore
> > >>* [WICKET-6100] - Upgrade jQuery to 1.12.3/2.2.3
> > >>* [WICKET-6103] - Synchronization on JSR 356 connection
> > >>* [WICKET-6106] - Propagate JSR 356 WebSocket connection error to a
> > >> page
> > >>* [WICKET-6107] - Broadcast onClose event regardless of the JSR
> > >> 356 WebSocket connection closed state
> > >>* [WICKET-6110] - Add a message to StalePageException for better
> > >> debugging
> > >>* [WICKET-6122] - Add .map to the list of allowed file extensions
> > >> in SecurePackageResourceGuard
> > >>* [WICKET-6123] - Remove 'abstract' from ChainingModel
> > >>* [WICKET-6127] - Add metrics for request duration
> > >>* [WICKET-6128] - Add metrics for currently active sessions
> > >>* [WICKET-6130] - Make it easier to override parts of SystemMapper
> > >>* [WICKET-6144] - Wicket-ajax parameter / header may be used to
> > >> bypass proper exception handling
> > >>* [WICKET-6145] - Enable DeltaManager to replicate PageTable in
> > >> Sessions
> > >>* [WICKET-6152] - Allow to add more than one WebSocketBehavior in
> > >> the component tree
> > >>
> > >> ** New Feature
> > >>
> > >>* [WICKET-6120] - Wicket Metrics
> > >>
> > >> ** Wish
> > >>
> > >>* [WICKET-6095] - Multiline headers in DataTable
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Thanks for support!
On Aug 5, 2016 16:23, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
> Severity: Important
>
> Vendor:
> The Apache Software Foundation
>
> Versions Affected:
> Apache Wicket 1.5.x, 6.x and 7.x
>
> Descriptions:
>
> CVE-2016-3092: A malicious client can send file upload requests that cause
> the H
Wicket 6 and 7, so I
> worked
> > on a branch[1] to showcase the idea and to get your thoughts while
> > resolving WICKET-6219 in wicket-7.x branch.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Pedro Santos
> >
> > 1 - https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/WICKET-6219-no-
> fragment-resolver
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
refore am
> requesting push access.
> My github username is: tgoetz
>
> Thanks in advance,
>Tom
>
>
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
12:24, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> wrote:
> >
> > I normally just
> >
> > 1- fork
> > 2- Create PR
> > 3-Other member validate and agree and Martin Grigorov or other wicket
> > committer merge changes when approved.
>
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started the release of WicketStuff 6.25.0/7.5.0/8.0.0-M2 versions.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi,
Does it make sense to use lambdas for things like
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-util/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/util/lang/Args.java#L37
?
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
void *test() {
Args.*notNull*(*this*, ()-> *"this"*);
}
}
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> How the new usage would look like ?
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Nov 25,
l-paraname8
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > *public class *Args
> > {
> > *public static * T n
Feliz navidad!
On Dec 24, 2016 16:50, "Sebastien" wrote:
> Merry Christmas to you too! :)
>
> On Dec 24, 2016 16:25, "Andrea Del Bene" wrote:
>
> Buon Natale to everyone!
>
>
>
> On 24/12/2016 16:21, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> > Let me correct myself!
> > Честита Коледа!
> >
> > On Dec 24, 2016
stedCacheBehavior.java
>
> Description is in the JavaDoc.
>
> Let me know if I've duplicated functionality we already have somewhere
> else or if you have any other feedback.
>
> Thanks
> Sven
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
ach these objects, *iff* they are detachable.
> > > > >> The current solution - even if semantically wrong - is simpler.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best regards
> > > > >> Sven
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 29.03.2017 15:52, Pedro Santos wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi team,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Not every model is detachable, but right now all models extends
> > from
> > > > >>> IDetachable because this contract is forced to any implementation
> > for
> > > > >>> IModel.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The only way users have to communicate their model isn't
> > detachable,
> > > > for
> > > > >>> their own purpose, is by creating their own mechanism; but I
> think
> > > > >>> IDetachable interface should serve its purpose and to mark / be
> > > > extended
> > > > >>> by
> > > > >>> detachable models, like documented in its own javadoc.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I did the changes necessary for this improvement in the branch
> > > > >>> 'not-detachable' at [1], and hope you can give your input. While
> > > > working
> > > > >>> on
> > > > >>> the branch I noticed a few problems in Wicket's code and already
> > > added
> > > > a
> > > > >>> fix:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> - LabeledWebMarkupContainer called wrapped model detach twice
> > (fixed)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> - SessionSizeModel has no detach logic but was being detached at
> > > > >>> SessionSizeDebugPanel (fixed)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> - The following classes had anonymous model wrappers that weren't
> > > > >>> extending
> > > > >>> from IWrapModel, that would better communicates their
> > purpose(fixed):
> > > > >>> LambdaColumn, IModel, LambdaModel, AjaxEditableLabel,
> LambdaColumn
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 1 - https://github.com/pedrosans/wicket/tree/not-detachable
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Pedro Santos
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Martijn Dashorst
>>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
ks this?
> If yes, I'd like to know the reasoning please. If not, I'm going to write a
> patch to fix this.
>
> Or maybe I'm missing something and am going the wrong way entirely. In
> that case, let me know please.
>
> Carl-Eric
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
her question is *why* this check isn't done for forms with submit
> components (I haven't tried it, but I suspect using a regular button
> rather than an ajax button would run into the same issue).
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018, at 14:45, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
> > H
like to know why
> there is this inconsistency between onFormSubmitted and
> onFormSubmitted(submitter).
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018, at 15:39, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
> > Ok. But does that posses a real security issue? i.e not logged used
> > triggering a click on &q
Hi,
Who will be at the office and when today?
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Wrong list :-)
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Hello Ernesto,
>
> I'll be available until ~23:00 (GMT+7) today
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
"mix" and experimenting
with ways to display selected values... As discussed with Dirk and Patrick.
Excuse me for the short notice
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Brr... excuse e-mail...
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems some neighbor thinks drilling season started and he is doing some
> very noisy repairmen's at home. So, me joining will be a pain for the res
ts of
advanced low level Wicket JavaScript and even WebSockets). Again everything
seems to work flawlessly. Wow!
Many thanks again to Wicket team!
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
features!
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:13 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to thanks Wicket's development team for wonderful work done
> > with wicket 8.x!
> >
> > Yesterday mid
lp to better elaborate the "New and
> > noteworthy" section. You can find it on web site repository:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/asf-site/2019/_posts/wicket-9.0.0-M1-released.md
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
on
> * @return The String
> * @see java.text.MessageFormat
> */
> public String getString(final String key,Object... parameters);
>
>
> Cheers,
> Tobias
>
> P.S. We're on Wicket 8 btw
>
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
656] - JSR 303 - @NotNull validation problems
> * [WICKET-6658] - Allow nested forms on non- tag
> * [WICKET-6659] - commons-io:commons-io is used in multiple
> versions at same time
> * [WICKET-6668] - Sign out the existing session if a sign in
> attempt has failed
>
> ** Task
>
> * [WICKET-6654] - Upgrade JQuery to 3.4.0
> * [WICKET-6661] - Upgrade jquery to 3.4.x
> * [WICKET-6665] - Upgrade various dependencies
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
t; https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WICKET/versions/12345372
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:20 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > subj :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrea Del Bene.
> Apache Wicket committer.
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
* [WICKET-6658] - Allow nested forms on non- tag
> > * [WICKET-6659] - commons-io:commons-io is used in multiple
> > versions at same time
> > * [WICKET-6662] - Remove legacy package org.apache.wicket.util.time
> > from wicket-util
> > * [WICKET-6667] - Ajax JavaScript clean-up
> > * [WICKET-6668] - Sign out the existing session if a sign in
> > attempt has failed
> >
> > ** Task
> >
> > * [WICKET-6653] - Upgrade Velocity to 2.x
> > * [WICKET-6654] - Upgrade JQuery to 3.4.0
> > * [WICKET-6661] - Upgrade jquery to 3.4.x
> > * [WICKET-6665] - Upgrade various dependencies
> >
> >
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I understand. Shall I create an issue for this?
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:27 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I found this non-blocker since this is milestone release
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 13:26, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
Or better ISSUE + PR?
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:57 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand. Shall I create an issue for this?
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:27 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
>> I found this non-blocker since this is
2
>
> Let me know what you think and thank you again.
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:59 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Or better ISSUE + PR?
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:57 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier
not so pleasant (to say the least), but I'd like to know how hard
> > would
> > > be to migrate your code from old Duration class to java.time.Duration.
> > > Ideally this should be quite straightforward as most of the time it
> > should
> > > be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6672
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> + 1 then. I will create issue later on + PR
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:02 PM Andrea Del Bene
> wrote:
>
>> I see your poin
I see it was reintroduced...
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:29 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6672
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>&
But AjaxTimer behaviours do not accept old wicket duration.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:40 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see it was reintroduced...
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:29 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.c
Thanks!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:11 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Welcome to the team, Ernesto!
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:36 PM Andrea Del Bene
> wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Wicket has asked
> Ernesto
> > Reinaldo Barreiro
the future of the framework.
> >
> > Welcome Ernesto!
> > --
> > Andrea Del Bene.
> > Apache Wicket committer.
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
t;
> >>>
> >>> CHANGELOG for 8.6.0:
> >>>
> >>> ** Bug
> >>>
> >>> * [WICKET-6613] - Wicket 8.1 ModalWindow autosizing problem
> >>> * [WICKET-6671] - IAjaxLink should be serializable
> >>> * [WICKET-6676] - Quickstart application won't deploy to GlassFish
> >>> * [WICKET-6680] - JavaScriptStripper chokes on template literals
> >>> that contain two forward slashes
> >>> * [WICKET-6689] - ClientProperties.getTimeZone() has some issue
> >>> when DST and UTC offsets are different
> >>> * [WICKET-6690] - NullPointerException in
> >>> KeyInSessionSunJceCryptFactory.
> >>> * [WICKET-6692] - Page deserialization on websocket close -
> >>> possible performance issue
> >>>
> >>> ** Improvement
> >>>
> >>> * [WICKET-6675] - log4j-slf4j-impl requires version 1.7.25 of
> >>> slf4j-api while Wicket 8.5 requires version 1.7.26
> >>> * [WICKET-6684] - Make autolabel functionality more flexible by
> >>> introducing a locator interface that allows to specify the component
> >>> the
> >>> wicket:for refers to
> >>> * [WICKET-6695] - Add AjaxEditable*Label#shouldTrimInput()
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
+ 1, all tests for our application pass + manual testing
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:53 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Testing my main customers application
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:23 AM Andrea Del Bene
> wrote:
>
>> +1 Tested use
6684] - Make autolabel functionality more flexible by
> introducing a locator interface that allows to specify the component the
> wicket:for refers to
> * [WICKET-6693] - Mark FormComponent#setModelValue(String[]) as not
> being part of the public API
> * [WICKET-6695] - Add AjaxEditable*Label#shouldTrimInput()
> * [WICKET-6696] - Unify AjaxEditable*#getConverter()
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
ersion 1.7.25 of
> slf4j-api while Wicket 8.5 requires version 1.7.26
> * [WICKET-6684] - Make autolabel functionality more flexible by
> introducing a locator interface that allows to specify the component the
> wicket:for refers to
> * [WICKET-6695] - Add AjaxEditable*Label#shouldTrimInput()
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
+1
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019, 9:50 PM Tobias Soloschenko
wrote:
> +1 for fixes :-)
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 09.09.2019 um 20:13 schrieb Andrea Del Bene :
> >
> > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.6.1
> >
> > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
> > lin
slf4j-api while Wicket 8.5 requires version 1.7.26
> > * [WICKET-6682] - Improve JavaScriptContentHeaderItem and
> > JavaScriptUtils to support nonce
> > * [WICKET-6683] - triggered events should bubble
> > * [WICKET-6684] - Make autolabel functionality more flexible by
> > introducing a locator interface that allows to specify the component
> > the wicket:for refers to
> > * [WICKET-6693] - Mark FormComponent#setModelValue(String[]) as
> > not being part of the public API
> > * [WICKET-6695] - Add AjaxEditable*Label#shouldTrimInput()
> > * [WICKET-6696] - Unify AjaxEditable*#getConverter()
> >
> > ** Task
> >
> > * [WICKET-6698] - Non-security critical dependency updates
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
9.x
> > branch for easier migration
> > * [WICKET-6673] - PriorityHeaderItem ordering is wrong for siblings
> > * [WICKET-6675] - log4j-slf4j-impl requires version 1.7.25 of
> > slf4j-api while Wicket 8.5 requires version 1.7.26
> > * [WICKET-6682] - I
n 9/15/19 11:57 AM, Sebastien Briquet wrote:
> > [x] Yes, release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M3
> > Tested upon wicket-jquery-ui
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >
> > > WDYT? :-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrea Del Bene.
> > > Apache Wicket committer.
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
or just a PR?
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Done
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:19 PM Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:42 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:09 PM Martin Grigorov
> > wrote
Happy new year.
+1 for new releases.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:08 PM Sebastien Briquet
wrote:
> Happy New Year to you all too! :)
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
topics from the
> user guide in context of the creation of a demo application and is
> available in the german language.
>
> The course might be an interesting option to be mentions at the learning
> page (https://wicket.apache.org/learn/)?
>
> Best
> Ansgar
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
t; enabled. I'm going to convert that bug into a task (we do not
> have
> > > > >>>> epic) and create new bugs for all issues in that ticket. That
> should
> > > > >>>> make it easier to track progress.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Best regards,
> > > > >>>> Emond
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:31 PM Emond Papegaaij
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>> Hi all,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> For the past few days I've been experimenting with the new CSP
> > > > >>>>> features in Wicket 9. I really want to thank Andrew, Sven and
> > > Martin
> > > > >>>>> for the great work you guys did in making this possible. I'm
> > > getting
> > > > >>>>> very close to running my application with a very tight and
> secure
> > > CSP.
> > > > >>>>> Unfortunately, some parts of Wicket still use inline styling
> and
> > > > >>>>> scripting. So far I've found the following two issues:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> * hidden components with setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true)
> have
> > > > >>> display:none
> > > > >>>>> * Forms render inline styling and javascript in some cases to
> > > improve
> > > > >>>>> submit handling
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> I think we should try to fix these before Wicket 9 is
> released. I
> > > will
> > > > >>>>> continue to debug our application to see if there are more
> places.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> At Topicus we wrote a IRequestCycleListener that applies the
> CSP
> > > > >>>>> automatically to every request via HTTP headers. The API makes
> it
> > > easy
> > > > >>>>> to configure the CSP. I've added support for the nonce as
> well. It
> > > > >>>>> uses a new nonce for every request, which should be more secure
> > > than a
> > > > >>>>> nonce bound to a session. I'll discuss with my employee next
> week
> > > if
> > > > >>>>> we can donate this code to Wicket.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Best regards,
> > > > >>>>> Emond
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Del Bene.
> > Apache Wicket committer.
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > options:
> > >
> > > [] leave as is with .wicket--hidden & wicket-core.css
> > >
> > > [] use HTML5 "hidden" attribute instead
> > >
> > > This isn't the vote yet, it's just the announcement.
> > > Maybe others see a third (forth?) option or want to raise their
> concerns
> > > first.
> > >
> > > Sven
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Del Bene.
> > Apache Wicket committer.
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:33 PM Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:26 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Right now I have no enough knowledge to vote in this feature. One thing I
> > didn&#x
+1
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 5:14 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> subj :)
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
hopes that we will release .Final after M5.
> I will do some changes now.
>
>
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 10:31 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar
Hahaha... as always Martin is too fast :-)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:40 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Martin commited method rename yesterday :)
>
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 15:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> wrote:
> >
> > -1: Thanks Martin. After your comment I just
Hierarchy()) {
target.add(component);
}
visit.dontGoDeeper();
}
});
}
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Ok. Problem is if component becomes invisible and needs to be removed from
server side,,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:56 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our application we have some logic that looks for certain panels and
> adds them to ART using ART.addChildren
> >>>> performance PoV) of Wicket - the Component state, and suggesting some
> >>>> bigger refactoring. I'd like this refactoring to be left for a later
> >>>> release. If there are no API breaks it could be 9.0.1 but if there
> >>>> will API
> >>>> breaks then it will have to wait for Wicket 10.
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Maxim
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Welcome!
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 4:20 AM Sebastien Briquet
wrote:
> Welcome Thomas :)
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
the FilePageStore NullPointerException:
> > It seems UserDefinedFileAttributeView is not available on Os X.
> > IMHO we can fix this later.
> >
>
> The NPE is a result of me breaking off the build (CTRL-C) I think. However,
> if others are able to build the package I'm fine with releasing it.
>
> Martijn
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
;
> Erik Geletti (1):
> Bootstrap version 3 (#698)
>
> The WicketStuff team
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I see
https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui
Doesn't compile against wicket 9.1.0. I will fix and create PR
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:20 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many thanks. Can
>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui
Or has source code moved to somewhere else?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:20 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see
>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui
>
> Doesn't compile against wicket 9.1.0. I will fix and create PR
>
>
&g
Yes. It seems my fork was not synchronized with original project
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:47 PM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Are you using `9.x` branch?
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 17:26, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> wrote:
> >
> > Or has source code moved to somewhere e
Hi,
I'm having a look at
AjaxDownloadBehavior
I would like to include a reference in javadoc to original work motivating
the idea.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/AJAX+update+and+file+download+in+one+blow
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:45 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Sure.
>
Ok.
>
> It has gone a long way from the original idea to what is today.
>
This I see.
>
> Have fun
>
I always have problems understanding what you mean by this.
> Sven
>
>
> On 28.10.20 11
+1 for release
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > > Am 28.10.2020 um 23:27 schrieb Sven Meier :
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > wicket-9.x got some important fixes, so we should release a 9.2.0 soon.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Sven
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:09 AM Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:54 AM Ma
h
> without session
> * [WICKET-6848] - Session invalidation fails because response is
> already committed
> * [WICKET-6849] - quickstart styling is broken due to CSP
>
> ** Improvement
>
> * [WICKET-6828] - Wrong tree branch icon with hidden children
> * [WICKET-6844] - Add support for MethodMismatchResponse for Ajax
> behaviors
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
* [WICKET-6840] - Busy indicator persists after request
> > * [WICKET-6841] - Evaluation order of dependent JS in Ajax request
> > * [WICKET-6845] - stackoverflow while serializing a page
> > containing a reference to session
> > * [WICKET-6847] - async page storing fails with flush before
> > detach without session
> > * [WICKET-6848] - Session invalidation fails because response is
> > already committed
> > * [WICKET-6849] - quickstart styling is broken due to CSP
> >
> > ** Improvement
> >
> > * [WICKET-6828] - Wrong tree branch icon with hidden children
> > * [WICKET-6844] - Add support for MethodMismatchResponse for Ajax
> > behaviors
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
y this time Java 17
> should
> > be mainstream! :-) I know that this is too brave. Most projects still use
> > Java 8 for some reason.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
gt; going
> > > > to be released this September and it is going to be LTS). I expect
> > Wicket
> > > > 10.0.0 to be released in 1-2 years from now, so by this time Java 17
> > > should
> > > > be mainstream! :-) I know that this is too brave. Most projects still
> > use
> > > > Java 8 for some reason.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >>> Sven
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 02.04.21 13:58, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time
[image: image.png]
Someone at work asked a question about how to know how to get from HTML to
java code... and I had the impression this was enabled by default on
development mode.
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
t 3:57 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > [image: image.png]
> >
>
> The image didn't make it thru the mailing list.
> Please use an online image pastebin service.
>
>
> >
> > Someone at work asked a question about
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:07 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Thanks for your answer. Better than that (use the source Luke)
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core
t; > I think it is disabled because it may break CSS rules with siblings.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:24 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I always disable this explicitly in my applications (e
additonal layer of complexity and boilerplatecode for
> us.
> >
> > Beside that: can wicket 10 finally get rid of jQuery? Since IE is now
> definitely dead I dont see any reason why this is still needed
> >
> > Best,
> > KB
> >
> >
> > - U
,
> > > > Tobias
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matt Pavlovich
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Apr 24, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Francois Meillet <
> > > > francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > How much work do you think this will imply?
> >
>
> Removing the component q
the work to get rid of it (a con).
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:43 AM Martin Terra <
martin.te...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> ke 2. kesäk. 2021 klo 9.36 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro (reier...@gmail.com)
> kirjoitti:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9
ted this feature and then never bothered to upgrade
> to something newer than 1.4.
> Sorry, but your votes don't count anymore! :-)
>
Martin: I fully agree with you. How this feature was introduced can, at
least, be called "weird".
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
.21 08:36, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> H
migration and your
> dev
> >> > > list will be kept in the loop.
> >> > >
> >> > > -
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Martin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 1.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r351aaa0f46fb0d0fc5e648d5c9b7c8b3c46c48eef897632ecde95d90%40%3Cbuilds.apache.org%3E
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Maxim
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Andrea Del Bene.
> >Apache Wicket committer.
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
gt; ** Task
>
> * [WICKET-6918] - Add links to latest wicket.xsd to the web site
> * [WICKET-6919] - Improve EnclosureContainer's javadoc to explain
> that it should not be used with
> * [WICKET-6925] - Deprecate AbstractWrapModel
>
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
ersion
> Cometd version is increased
> javadocs are partially fixed
> Wicket is updated, link to broken javadoc is commented out
> Javadocs seems to be fixed
> Dependencies are updated
> wicketstuff-core-9.6.0 released
>
>
> The WicketStuff team
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:04 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:12 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What do you think about rolling outwicket 9.7.0?
> >
> >
> 9.6.0 has been re
> >
> > > > [sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui] Bump jetty-webapp from 9.4.42.v20210604 to
> > > > 9.4.43.v20210629 in /wicket-jquery-ui-samples (PR #340)
> > > >
> > > > This automated pull request fixes a security vulnerability (moderate
> > > > severity).
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Sébastien
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Maxim
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Del Bene.
> > Apache Wicket committer.
> >
>
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Many thanks!
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:59 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Who can do the keystore changes?
> >
>
> Done with https://issues.apac
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
